Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765012›Full record

ArticleEmerging themes in epidemiology2022

Are verbatim transcripts necessary in applied qualitative research: experiences from two community-based intervention trials in Ghana.

Zelee Hill, Charlotte Tawiah-Agyemang, Betty Kirkwood, Carl Kendall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging themes in epidemiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Zelee HillInstitute for Global Health, University College London, 30 Guilford St., London, WC1N 1EH, UK. z.hill@ucl.ac.uk.
Charlotte Tawiah-AgyemangKintampo Health Research Centre, P.O. Box 200, Kintampo, Ghana.
Betty KirkwoodLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Carl KendallDepartment of Global Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2350, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Kintampo Health Research Centre · GHTulane University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of London · GB

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1138582Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPPGH5297
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conducting qualitative research within public health trials requires balancing timely data collection with the need to maintain data quality. Verbatim transcription of interviews is the conventional way of recording qualitative data, but is time consuming and can severely delay the availability of research findings. Expanding field notes into fair notes is a quicker alternative method, but is not usually recommended as interviewers select and interpret what they record. We used the fair note methodology in Ghana, and found that where research questions are relatively simple, and interviewers undergo sufficient training and supervision, fair notes can decrease data collection and analysis time, while still providing detailed and relevant information to the study team. Interviewers liked the method and felt it made them more reflective and analytical and improved their interview technique. The exception was focus group discussions, where the fair note approach failed to capture the interaction and richness of discussions, capturing group consensus rather than the discussions leading to this consensus.

Indexed as

AfricaField notesGhanaMaternal and child healthMethodologyQualitative researchTranscription

Identifiers

PMID35765012
PMCPMC9238251
OpenAlexW4283647263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.