Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35765004›Full record

ReviewJournal of neuroinflammation2022

Using zebrafish to understand reciprocal interactions between the nervous and immune systems and the microbial world.

Jean-Pierre Levraud, John F Rawls, Anne E Clatworthy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Zebrafish: A Versatile and Powerful Model for Biomedical Research.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Characterizing trajectories of innate immune cells in larval zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Synthesis of immunomodulatory biomimetic lipid polymer hybrid nanoparticles and application of zebrafish larvae in immunomodulation screening.European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jean-Pierre LevraudUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Cité, Institut des Neurosciences Paris-Saclay, 91400, Saclay, France. jean-pierre.levraud@pasteur.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6775-2416
John F RawlsDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke Microbiome Center, Duke University School of Medicine, 213 Research Drive, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. john.rawls@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5976-5206
Anne E ClatworthyBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, 415 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA. clatwort@broadinstitute.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-1014

Funding

Role of IL-10 in APC Regulation of Protective vs. Pathogenic T Cell Responses toP01DK094779 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SARTOR, RYAN B · 2013 to 2023
$17.9M
Identifying genes required for digestive physiology and lipid metabolismR01DK093399 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN A FARBER, John F Rawls · 2013 to 2026
$7.6M
Immune Compromises Zebrafish for Cell TransplantationR24OD016761 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LANGENAU, DAVID MICHAEL · 2013 to 2021
$5.2M
Microbial Regulation of Host Nutrient MetabolismR01DK081426 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI RAWLS, JOHN F · 2008 to 2019
$3.9M
Genetic and Epigenetic Regulation of Intestinal InflammationR01DK113123 · NIDDK · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BAGNAT, MICHEL · 2018 to 2021
$1.7M
Agence Nationale de la Recherche ANR-16-CE20-0002-03Agence Nationale de la Recherche (FR) ANR-21-CE35-0019-03Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation Symbiosis in aquatic systems initiativeH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions ITN 955576NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK094779NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK081426NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK093399NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK113123NIH HHS P01-DK094779NIH HHS R01 DK081426NIH HHS R01-DK093399NIH HHS R01-DK113123NIH HHS R24 OD016761NIH HHS R24-OD016761Pew Charitable Trusts Innovation fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animals rely heavily on their nervous and immune systems to perceive and survive within their environment. Despite the traditional view of the brain as an immunologically privileged organ, these two systems interact with major consequences. Furthermore, microorganisms within their environment are major sources of stimuli and can establish relationships with animal hosts that range from pathogenic to mutualistic. Research from a variety of human and experimental animal systems are revealing that reciprocal interactions between microbiota and the nervous and immune systems contribute significantly to normal development, homeostasis, and disease. The zebrafish has emerged as an outstanding model within which to interrogate these interactions due to facile genetic and microbial manipulation and optical transparency facilitating in vivo imaging. This review summarizes recent studies that have used the zebrafish for analysis of bidirectional control between the immune and nervous systems, the nervous system and the microbiota, and the microbiota and immune system in zebrafish during development that promotes homeostasis between these systems. We also describe how the zebrafish have contributed to our understanding of the interconnections between these systems during infection in fish and how perturbations may result in pathology.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaZebrafishAnimalsBrainHomeostasisImmune SystemHomeostasisMicrobiotaNeuro-immune interactionsZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID35765004
PMCPMC9238045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.