ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022
A finite element analysis on different bone cement forms and injection volumes injected into lumbar vertebral body in percutaneous kyphoplasty.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- DGOU classification guided cement diffusion strategy in unilateral kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multiphysics finite element analysis of vertebral stability in simulated osteolytic lumbar defects treated withFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Biomechanical study of robot-navigated targeted cross-puncture percutaneous vertebroplasty for Kümmell's disease: finite element analysis.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2026Article
- Biomechanical changes of different cement volumes at the thoracolumbar vertebrae in osteoporotic compression fractures: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Two different unilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty approaches for acute osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: clinical and radiological outcomes.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- The effect of different degrees of visible trephine-based foraminoplasty in PETD surgery on lumbar biomechanics: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Biomechanical comparison of different bilateral percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: finite element analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a U-type finite element model of an osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Biomechanical Comparisons between One- and Two-Compartment Devices for Reconstructing Vertebrae by Kyphoplasty.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Biomechanical study between percutaneous vertebroplasty combined with cement pedicle plasty improves vertebral biomechanical stability: A finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Effect of cement volume on biomechanical response of a spine segment treated with a PEEK polymer implant: a finite element comparative study with vertebroplasty.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of acute single versus multiple osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in radiographic characteristic and bone fragility.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Biomechanical analysis of sandwich vertebrae in osteoporotic patients: finite element analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Article
- A 20-Year Review of Biomechanical Experimental Studies on Spine Implants Used for Percutaneous Surgical Repair of Vertebral Compression Fractures.BioMed research international · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTo investigate the stress changes between different bone cement forms and injection volumes in adjacent vertebrae after percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) by establishing a three-dimensional finite element model of osteoporosis.
methodsA male healthy volunteer was selected. CT of scans L1 to L3 vertebrae were imported into Mimics 21.0 software.The vertebral model of osteoporosiswas established based on previous literature reference. The models were divided into three groups: unilateral, bilateral integration and bilateral separation groups, with each group injecting 2 ml, 4,ml and 6 ml of bone cement, respectively. In all models, a vertical compressive load of 500 N, anterior flexion/posterior extension, left/right bending, and left/right rotation were applied with a moment of 7.5 N/m, of which 85% was applied to the anterior mid-column and 15% to the posterior column. The stress changes between adjacent vertebrae under different conditions were calculated.
resultsAfter percutaneous kyphoplasty was applied to the L2 vertebral body, some differences can be found between the effects of different cement injection volumes and cement morphology on adjacent structures. There was no major difference between the groups when the bone cement injection volume was 2 ml. When the amount of bone cement injected was 4 ml, the bone cement morphology of the bilateral integration group (BIG) produced less stress between adjacent vertebral bodies. The minimum stress was 14.95 MPa in the L3 vertebral body in posterior extension. Whereas the stress levels on adjacent intervertebral structures, BIG shaped bone cement shows some superiority. In addition, the adjacent vertebrae and intervertebral structures are subjected to less stress during left and right rotation.
conclusionsThe present finite element study suggested that bilateral integration bone cement is a suitable form of cement injection, and when the injection volume is 4 ml, reduces stress on adjacent segments by approximately 15% while maintaining the stability of the injected vertebral body.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.