ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022
Consolidation regimens in primary central nervous system lymphoma: a single-center retrospective cohort evaluating survival outcomes and cost-benefit analysis.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cost outcomes of pituitary adenoma resection: The use of a hybrid microscopic/endoscopic surgery.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
ABSTRACT: PURPOSE: Optimal treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) comprises polychemotherapy induction with high-dose methotrexate followed by consolidation therapy, but there is no standard treatment regimen because of a lack of comparative trials examining efficacy or relative value. We performed a retrospective outcome and relative cost analysis on consolidation regimens to gain perspective on how cost and benefit can be weighed in medical decisions for patients with PCNSL.
methodsPatients with newly diagnosed PCNSL who completed consolidation at our institution from July 1, 2012, to March 1, 2019, were included. Patients completed etoposide/cytarabine (EA), high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC), or high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell rescue (HDC-ASCR) as consolidation regimen. Data were collected from the electronic medical record and our institution's Value Driven Outcomes tool. Survival was analyzed as date of diagnosis to last known date of survival.
resultsOf the 22 patients included in the study, 12 completed the EA regimen, 4 completed HDC-ASCR, and 6 completed HIDAC. Facility and pharmacy costs contributed most to the cost of each treatment. HDC-ASCR treatment was 50× the cost of the cheapest treatment, HIDAC. Outcomes were numerically superior with HDC-ASCR and HIDAC compared with EA (2-year progression-free survival 100% vs. 100% vs. 63.6%, respectively, p = 0.1915).
conclusionThis small retrospective cost-benefit analysis provides evidence that HDC-ASCR may be a superior treatment for PCNSL but at a higher cost than other consolidation regimens. HIDAC may increase value for patients, including elderly patients, who are not appropriate candidates for HDC-ASCR when compared with EA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.