SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2023
Circulating microRNAs as Potential Biomarkers for the Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer: a Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Serum Palmitoleic Acid and Arachidonic Acid as a Noninvasive Screening Tool for Endometrial Cancer.Cancers · 2026Article
- Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers in Endometrial Cancer: Current Landscape and Future Perspectives.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- CircRNAs-Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for Receptive and Cancerous Endometrium.Epigenomes · 2025Review
- A Potential Regulatory Network of Selected Human Erythrocytic miRNAs withMicroRNA (Shariqah, United Arab Emirates) · 2025Article
- Advancements in Minimally Invasive Techniques and Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Diagnostic Approaches and Clinical Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Screening Strategies to Improve Early Diagnosis in Endometrial Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- circRNAs in Endometrial Cancer-A Promising Biomarker: State of the Art.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Metabolomic-Based Approaches for Endometrial Cancer Diagnosis and Prognosis: A Review.Cancers · 2023Review
- The interplay of sex steroid hormones and microRNAs in endometrial cancer: current understanding and future directions.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common female genital tract malignancy worldwide. Many investigators have confirmed the possibility of using circulating miRNAs to diagnose EC; however, the results were inconsistent. Therefore, we performed the current meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the diagnostic value of circulating miRNAs in EC. We carefully searched relevant articles published prior to February 15, 2022 in the databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) based on PRISMA statement. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to test the diagnostic accuracy. Furthermore, subgroup analyses were performed to identify the potential sources of heterogeneity, and the Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test was used to evaluate the potential publication bias. Twenty-one studies from 12 articles including a total of 2305 participants (1341 EC patients and 964 controls) were included in the current diagnostic meta-analysis. The overall pooled results of miRNA for EC diagnosis were: sensitivity, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.79-0.88); specificity, 0.87 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91); PLR, 6.3 (95% CI: 3.9-10.0); NLR, 0.18 (95% CI: 0.13-0.25); DOR, 35 (95% CI: 17-71); and AUC was 0.91 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94). Subgroup analysis suggested that miRNA cluster, serum type, and large sample sizes showed a better diagnostic accuracy. Moreover, there was no significant publication bias. Circulating miRNAs have great potential as novel non-invasive biomarkers for EC diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.