Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764846›Full record

ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2022

Landmark-based retrieval of inflamed skin vessels enabled by 3D correlative intravital light and volume electron microscopy.

Karina Mildner, Leonhard Breitsprecher, Silke M Currie, Rebekka I Stegmeyer, Malte Stasch, Stefan Volkery, Olympia Ekaterini Psathaki, Dietmar Vestweber, Dagmar Zeuschner

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karina MildnerElectron Microscopy Unit, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Röntgenstr. 20, 48149, Münster, Germany.
Leonhard BreitsprecheriBiOs-integrated Bioimaging Facility Osnabrück, CellNanOs- Center for Cellular Nanoanalytics, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Silke M CurrieDepartment of Vascular Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Münster, Germany.
Rebekka I StegmeyerDepartment of Vascular Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Münster, Germany.
Malte StaschBioOptic Service Unit, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Münster, Germany.
Stefan VolkeryBioOptic Service Unit, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Münster, Germany.
Olympia Ekaterini PsathakiiBiOs-integrated Bioimaging Facility Osnabrück, CellNanOs- Center for Cellular Nanoanalytics, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Dietmar VestweberDepartment of Vascular Cell Biology, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Münster, Germany.
Dagmar ZeuschnerElectron Microscopy Unit, Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine, Röntgenstr. 20, 48149, Münster, Germany. D.Zeuschner@mpi-muenster.mpg.de.
Max Planck Institute for Molecular Biomedicine · DEOsnabrück University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nanometer spatial resolution of electron microscopy imaging remains an advantage over light microscopy, but the restricted field of view that can be inspected and the inability to visualize dynamic cellular events are definitely drawbacks of standard transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Several methods have been developed to overcome these limitations, mainly by correlating the light microscopical image to the electron microscope with correlative light and electron microscopy (CLEM) techniques. Since there is more than one method to obtain the region of interest (ROI), the workflow must be adjusted according to the research question and biological material addressed. Here, we describe in detail the development of a three-dimensional CLEM workflow for mouse skin tissue exposed to an inflammation stimulus and imaged by intravital microscopy (IVM) before fixation. Our aim is to relocate a distinct vessel in the electron microscope, addressing a complex biological question: how do cells interact with each other and the surrounding environment at the ultrastructural level? Retracing the area over several preparation steps did not involve any specific automated instruments but was entirely led by anatomical and artificially introduced landmarks, including blood vessel architecture and carbon-coated grids. Successful retrieval of the ROI by electron microscopy depended on particularly high precision during sample manipulation and extensive documentation. Further modification of the TEM sample preparation protocol for mouse skin tissue even rendered the specimen suitable for serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM).

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalSkinAnimalsMiceMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningMicroscopy, Electron, TransmissionCorrelative light and electron microscopyDorsal skinfold chamberIntravital microscopyLive cell imagingSerial block-face scanning electron microscopyTransmission electron microscopy

Identifiers

PMID35764846
PMCPMC9338004
OpenAlexW4283691634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.