Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764844›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Reverse TAR may be added when necessary in open preperitoneal repair of lateral incisional hernias: a retrospective multicentric cohort study.

Joaquin M Munoz-Rodriguez, Javier Lopez-Monclus, Marina Perez-Flecha, Alvaro Robin-Valle de Lersundi, Luis A Blazquez-Hernando, Ana Royuela-Vicente, Juan P Garcia-Hernandez, Aritz Equisoain-Azcona, Manuel Medina-Pedrique, Miguel A Garcia-Urena

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Joaquin M Munoz-RodriguezPuerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Javier Lopez-MonclusPuerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain. jlopezmonclus@yahoo.es.
Marina Perez-FlechaHenares University Hospital, Av. de Marie Curie, 0, 28822, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
Alvaro Robin-Valle de LersundiHenares University Hospital, Av. de Marie Curie, 0, 28822, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
Luis A Blazquez-HernandoRamón y Cajal University Hospital, M-607, 9, 100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Royuela-VicentePuerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Juan P Garcia-HernandezAlcala de Henares University, Campus Universitario-C/ 19, Av. de Madrid, Km 33,600, 28871, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain.
Aritz Equisoain-AzconaPuerta de Hierro Majadahonda University Hospital, C. Joaquín Rodrigo, 1, 28222, Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel Medina-PedriqueHenares University Hospital, Av. de Marie Curie, 0, 28822, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
Miguel A Garcia-UrenaHenares University Hospital, Av. de Marie Curie, 0, 28822, Coslada, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario del Henares · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ESUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESInstituto Cajal · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe best approach for lateral incisional hernia is not known. Posterior component separation (reverse TAR) offers the possibility of using the retromuscular space for medial extension of the challenging preperitoneal plane. The aim of our multicenter study was to compare the operative and patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) using two open surgical techniques from the lateral approach: a totally preperitoneal vs a reverse TAR.

methodsA retrospective cohort study was performed since 2012 to 2020. Patients with lateral incisional hernia treated through a lateral approach were identified from a prospectively maintained multicenter database. Reverse TAR was added when the preperitoneal plane could not be safely dissected. The results obtained using these two lateral approaches were compared, including short- and long-term complications, as well as PROMs, using the specific tool EuraHSQoL.

resultsA total of 61 patients were identified. Reverse TAR was performed in 33 patients and lateral retromuscular preperitoneal approach in 28 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of sociodemographic and comorbidities variables. Surgical site occurrences occurred in 13 cases (21.3%), with 8 patients (13.1%) requiring procedural intervention. During a median follow-up of 34 months, no incisional hernia recurrence was registered. There was a case (1.6%) of symptomatic bulging that required reoperation. Also 12 patients (19.7%) presented an asymptomatic bulging. No statistically significant difference was identified in the complications and PROMs between the two procedures.

conclusionThe open lateral retromuscular reconstruction using very large meshes that reach the midline has excellent long-term results with acceptable postoperative complications, including PROMs. A reverse TAR may be added, when necessary, without increasing complications and obtaining similar long-term results.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralIncisional HerniaAbdominal MusclesHerniorrhaphyHumansRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesSurgical MeshComplex abdominal wall reconstructionLateral incisional herniaLateral retromuscular preperitonealPatient reported outcomes measuressPosterior component separation techniqueReverse TAR

Identifiers

PMID35764844
OpenAlexW4283706605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.