Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764841›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2022

Management strategies of anastomotic ulcer after gastric bypass and risk factors of recurrence.

Ophélie Bacoeur-Ouzillou, Julie Perinel, Elise Pelascini, Mourad Abdallah, Gilles Poncet, Arnaud Pasquer, Maud Robert

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ophélie Bacoeur-OuzillouChirurgie viscérale et digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Estaing, 1 Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63000, Clermont Ferrand, France. obacoeurouzillou1@chu-clermontferrand.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4352-5854
Julie PerinelChirurgie viscérale et Bariatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69437, Lyon, France.
Elise PelasciniChirurgie viscérale et Bariatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69437, Lyon, France.
Mourad AbdallahChirurgie viscérale et digestive, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, Hôpital Estaing, 1 Place Lucie et Raymond Aubrac, 63000, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Gilles PoncetChirurgie viscérale et Bariatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69437, Lyon, France.
Arnaud PasquerChirurgie viscérale et Bariatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69437, Lyon, France.
Maud RobertChirurgie viscérale et Bariatrique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 5 Place d'Arsonval, 69437, Lyon, France. maud.robert@chu-lyon.fr.
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMarginal ulcers (MU) after gastric bypass are a challenging problem. The first-line treatment is a medical therapy with eviction of risk factors but is sometimes insufficient. The management strategies of intractable ulcers are still not clearly defined. The aim of our study was to analyse the risk factors for recurrence, the management strategies used and their efficiencies.

methodsBased on a retrospective analysis of all MU managed in our tertiary care centre of bariatric surgery during the last 14 years, a descriptive analysis of the cohort, the management strategies and their efficiency were analysed. A logistic regression was done to identify the independent associated risk factors of intractable ulcer.

resultsFifty-six patients matched inclusion criteria: 30 were referred to us (13 Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-RYGB and 17 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-OAGB), 26 were operated on in our institution (24 RYGB and 2 OAGB). 11 patients had a complicated inaugural MU requiring an interventional procedure in emergency: 7 perforations, 4 haemorrhages. The majority of MU were treated medically as a first-line therapy (n = 45; 80.4%). 32 MU recurred: 20 patients required surgery as a 2nd line therapy, 6 were operated on as a 3rd line therapy and 1 had a surgery as a 5th line therapy. The OAGB was the only risk factor of recurrence (p = 0.018). We found that the Surgical management was significantly more frequent for patients with a OAGB (84% versus 35% for RYGB, p = 0.001); the most performed surgical procedure was a conversion of OAGB to RYGB (n = 11, 37.9%).

conclusionSurgery was required for a large number of MU especially in case of recurrence, but recurrence can still occur after the surgery. The OAGB was the only risk factor of recurrence identified and conversion to RYGB seemed to be effective for the healing.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidPeptic UlcerHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsUlcerBariatric surgeryIntractable marginal ulcerMarginal ulcerOne anastomosis gastric bypassRecurrenceRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID35764841
OpenAlexW4283690126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.