ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2022
Pilot Animal Study on Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Visceral Interventions.
Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- In vitro fenestrated endovascular aortic repair deployment and cannulation using an electromagnetically steerable guide wire.Journal of vascular surgery cases and innovative techniques · 2026Article
- Magnetic Control of Intravascular Collaborative Robotic (Cobot) Guidewire: Neurovascular Intervention Studies in Phantom and Swine Models.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Robotic Assistance in Visceral Interventions: A Step Toward Safer Interventional Radiology.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical Feasibility of Robotic-Assisted Endovascular Visceral Interventions.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2026Article
- Impact of robotic assistance on the learning curve in endovascular interventions: exploring the role of operator experience with the CorPath GRX system.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate technical feasibility and safety of common endovascular visceral interventions using a vascular robotic platform through preclinical study. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe CorPath GRX Robotic System (Corindus Inc, Waltham, Massachusetts) was tested in an anesthetized pig for its ability to navigate various commercially available devices in the abdominal vasculature and to perform routine endovascular visceral procedures. After manually placing a guiding catheter in the celiac trunk, several visceral branches were probed with microcatheters and -wires under robotic assistance, and embolization with liquids (lipiodol), detachable coils and plugs were performed. Furthermore, the origin of the celiac trunk was stented before accessing the left hypogastric artery for pelvic embolization.
resultsAll procedures were performed with technical success and without any complications. Navigating the catheters and wires via the steering console proved intuitive. Coil, plug and stent deployment were exclusively controlled by remote with remarkable precision and stability.
conclusionRobotic-assisted visceral embolization and stenting as well as pelvic embolization using the CorPath GRX System is feasible and safe. Application of the platform in the abdominal vasculature is demonstrated for the first time. Considering the precision and the potential for reducing the operator's radiation exposure, further research in this area is highly encouraged to enable translation into clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.