Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764817›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2022

External evaluation of population pharmacokinetic models for voriconazole in Chinese adult patients with hematological malignancy.

Weikun Huang, You Zheng, Huiping Huang, Yu Cheng, Maobai Liu, Nupur Chaphekar, Xuemei Wu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Weikun HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Gulou District, 29 Xinquan Rd., Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
You ZhengDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Gulou District, 29 Xinquan Rd., Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Huiping HuangDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Gulou District, 29 Xinquan Rd., Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Yu ChengDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Gulou District, 29 Xinquan Rd., Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Maobai LiuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Gulou District, 29 Xinquan Rd., Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China.
Nupur ChaphekarDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Xuemei WuDepartment of Pharmacy, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Gulou District, 29 Xinquan Rd., Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian, China. wuxuemei@fjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9962-9751
Fujian Medical University · CNUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPatients with hematological malignancies are prone to invasive fungal disease due to long-term chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Voriconazole is a second-generation triazole broad-spectrum antibiotic used to prevent or treat invasive fungal infections. Many population pharmacokinetic (pop PK) models have been published for voriconazole, and various diagnostic methods are available to validate the performance of these pop PK models. However, most of the published models have not been strictly evaluated externally. The purpose of this study is to evaluate these models externally and assess their predictive capabilities.

methodsThe external dataset consists of adults receiving voriconazole treatment at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital. We re-established the published models based on their final estimated values in the literature and used our external dataset for initial screening. Each model was evaluated based on the following outcomes: prediction-based diagnostics, prediction- and variability-corrected visual predictive check (pvcVPC), normalized prediction distribution errors (NPDE), and Bayesian simulation results with one to two prior observations.

resultsA total of 237 samples from 166 patients were collected as an external dataset. After screening, six candidate models suitable for the external dataset were finally obtained for comparison. Among the models, none demonstrated excellent predictive performance. Bayesian simulation shows that all models' prediction precision and accuracy were significantly improved when one or two prior concentrations were given.

conclusionsThe published pop PK models of voriconazole have significant differences in prediction performance, and none of the models could perfectly predict the concentrations of voriconazole for our data. Therefore, extensive evaluation should precede the adoption of any model in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsTriazolesAdultAntifungal AgentsBayes TheoremChinaHumansModels, BiologicalVoriconazoleAntifungal AgentsTriazolesVoriconazoleExternal evaluationHematological malignancyPopulation pharmacokinetic modelVoriconazole

Identifiers

PMID35764817
OpenAlexW4283706196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.