Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764784›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

A model-specific simplification of the Mouse Grimace Scale based on the pain response of intraperitoneal CCl

Lisa Ernst, Stefan Bruch, Marcin Kopaczka, Dorit Merhof, André Bleich, René H Tolba, Steven R Talbot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Grimace scale assessment duringFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lisa ErnstFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Stefan BruchFaculty of Medicine, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Marcin KopaczkaInstitute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Dorit MerhofInstitute of Imaging and Computer Vision, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
André Bleich *Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.
René H Tolba *Faculty of Medicine, Institute for Laboratory Animal Science and Experimental Surgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. rtolba@ukaachen.de.
Steven R Talbot *Institute for Laboratory Animal Science, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite its long establishment and applicability in mice pain detection, the Mouse Grimace Scale still seems to be underused in acute pain detection during chronic experiments. However, broadening its applicability can identify possible refinement approaches such as cumulative severity and habituation to painful stimuli. Therefore, this study focuses on two main aspects: First, five composite MGS criteria were evaluated with two independent methods (the MoBPs algorithm and a penalized least squares regression) and ranked for their relative importance. The most important variable was used in a second analysis to specifically evaluate the context of pain after an i.p. injection (intervention) in two treatment groups (CCl

Indexed as

Acute PainFacial ExpressionAnimalsInjections, IntraperitonealMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPain Measurement

Identifiers

PMID35764784
PMCPMC9240072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.