Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764764›Full record

ArticleNeurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics2022

Quantifying Patient Investment in Novel Neurological Drug Development.

Amanda MacPherson, Elias Gumnit, Charlotte Ouimet, Nora Hutchinson, Karl Kieburtz, Toni S Pearson, Jonathan Kimmelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Human Cost: Patient Contribution to Clinical Trials in Neurology.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda MacPhersonDepartment of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University School of Population and Global Health, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2349-7289
Elias GumnitDepartment of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University School of Population and Global Health, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Charlotte OuimetDepartment of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University School of Population and Global Health, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Nora HutchinsonDepartment of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University School of Population and Global Health, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada.
Karl KieburtzDepartment of Neurology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
Toni S PearsonDepartment of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jonathan KimmelmanDepartment of Equity, Ethics and Policy, McGill University School of Population and Global Health, 2001 McGill College Avenue, Montreal, QC, H3A 1G1, Canada. jonathan.kimmelman@mcgill.ca.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the drug development literature provides numerous estimates of the financial costs to bring a new drug to market, the investment of patient-participants in the research process has not been described. Trial participants and their caregivers, like companies, invest time and undertake risk when they participate in prelicense trials. We determined the average number of patient-participants needed to develop a novel neurological drug. We created a cohort of 108 unapproved drugs first tested for efficacy between 2006 and 2011 and used ClinicalTrials.gov to capture enrollment in all subsequent prelicense trials of these drugs over a 9-year period. Our primary outcome was the average number of patients enrolled in prelicense neurological drug trials per drug that ultimately attained FDA approval, including patients who participated in both successful and unsuccessful development efforts. Five drugs (4.6%) were FDA approved, and 66,751 patient-participants were enrolled across successful and unsuccessful drug development efforts, resulting in an average of 13,350 patients for each drug attaining approval (95% CI 7155 to 54,954). Our estimates reveal the substantial amount patients and their caregivers contribute to private drug development.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug DevelopmentHumansUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationClinical trialsCNS disordersDrug developmentResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID35764764
PMCPMC9606150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.