Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764745›Full record

ReviewNature cancer2022

Charting roadmaps towards novel and safe synergistic immunotherapy combinations.

Miguel F Sanmamed, Pedro Berraondo, Maria E Rodriguez-Ruiz, Ignacio Melero

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Just how transformative will AI/ML be for immuno-oncology?Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024
    Review
  18. EMID2 is a novel biotherapeutic for aggressive cancers identified by in vivo screening.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miguel F SanmamedProgram of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Cima Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Pedro BerraondoProgram of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Cima Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7410-1865
Maria E Rodriguez-RuizProgram of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Cima Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ignacio MeleroProgram of Immunology and Immunotherapy, Cima Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain. imelero@unav.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1360-348X
Navarre Institute of Health Research · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Checkpoint inhibitor-based cancer immunotherapy is often combined in the clinic with other immunotherapy strategies, targeted therapies, chemotherapy or standard-of-care treatments to achieve superior therapeutic efficacy. The large number of immunotherapy combinations that are currently undergoing clinical testing necessitate the establishment of faithful criteria to prioritize optimal combinations with evidence of synergy, to determine their safety and optimal sequence of administration and to identify biomarkers of therapy resistance and response. In this review, we focus on recent developments in immunotherapy combinations and reflect on how combinations should be optimized to maximize the impact of immunotherapy in clinical oncology.

Indexed as

Immunologic FactorsImmunotherapyAmbulatory Care FacilitiesMedical OncologyImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID35764745
OpenAlexW4283649793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.