Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764668›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2022

Effects of animal-assisted psychotherapy incorporating mindfulness and self-compassion in neurorehabilitation: a randomized controlled feasibility trial.

Pascale Künzi, Michael Ackert, Martin Grosse Holtforth, Margret Hund-Georgiadis, Karin Hediger

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07356206 (Between Paws and Affections), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07356206 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Between Paws and Affections: Impact of Dog Assisted Therapy on Pain, Emotional Symptoms, and Functioning in Fibromyalgia

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinhoRan2026 to 2029Enrolled60ConditionsFibromyalgia (FM)ArmsBehavioral: Dog Assisted Therapy (DAT - "Between Paws and Affections"), Behavioral: Psychoeducation and Relaxation without Dogs (Control)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pascale KünziDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland. pascalekuenzi@hotmail.com.
Michael AckertDepartment of Psychology, University of Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Martin Grosse HoltforthDivision of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Margret Hund-GeorgiadisREHAB Basel, Clinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, Basel, Switzerland.
Karin HedigerREHAB Basel, Clinic for Neurorehabilitation and Paraplegiology, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Bern · CHSwiss Paraplegic Center · CHSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CHUniversity of Fribourg · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation Nr. PZ00P1_174082/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transdiagnostic psychotherapeutic approaches are increasingly used in neurorehabilitation to address psychological distress. Animal-assistance is thought to increase efficacy. The present study evaluates a psychotherapeutic mindfulness- and self-compassion-based group intervention (MSCBI) with and without animal-assistance for patients with acquired brain injury. Patients (N = 31) were randomly assigned to the 6-week intervention with (n = 14) or without animal-assistance (n = 17). Primary outcome was psychological distress at post- and follow-up treatment, secondary outcomes were changes within-session of patients' emotional states, adherence to treatment and attrition. Psychological distress significantly decreased in both groups from pre- to follow-up treatment with no difference between groups. Patients in the animal-assisted MSCBI group reported significantly higher increases in feeling secure, accepted, comforted, grateful, motivated and at ease during the sessions compared to patients in the MSCBI group without animal-assistance. Adherence to sessions was significantly higher in the animal-assisted MSCBI group. Attrition did not significantly differ between groups. Our results show that both MSCBIs with and without animal-assistance are feasible and effective in reducing psychological distress in patients with acquired brain injury. The significant changes within-sessions mainly in relationship-based emotional states and the higher treatment adherence suggest additional effects of animal-assistance. Animal-assistance might increase acceptability and patients' commitment to psychotherapy.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesMindfulnessNeurological RehabilitationAnimalsFeasibility StudiesHumansSelf-Compassion

Identifiers

PMID35764668
PMCPMC9240064
OpenAlexW4283646946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.