Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764662›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of learning2022

Instructor-learner body coupling reflects instruction and learning.

Yafeng Pan, Suzanne Dikker, Yi Zhu, Cuirong Yang, Yi Hu, Pavel Goldstein

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of learning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Spontaneous movement synchrony as an exogenous source for interbrain synchronization in cooperative learning.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yafeng Pan *Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5633-8313
Suzanne Dikker *NYU-Max Planck Center for Language, Music and Emotion, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6576-4966
Yi ZhuShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Cuirong YangDepartment of Psychology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, China.
Yi HuShanghai Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Psychological Crisis Intervention, Institute of Brain and Education Innovation, School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China. yhu@psy.ecnu.edu.cn.
Pavel GoldsteinIntegrative Pain (iPain) Laboratory, School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel. pavelg@stat.haifa.ac.il.
East China Normal University · CNShanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology · CNSuzhou University of Science and Technology · CNUniversity of Haifa · ILVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31872783
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is widely accepted that nonverbal communication is crucial for learning, but the exact functions of interpersonal coordination between instructors and learners remain unclear. Specifically, it is unknown what role instructional approaches play in the coupling of physical motion between instructors and learners, and crucially, how such instruction-mediated Body-to-Body Coupling (BtBC) might affect learning. We used a video-based, computer-vision Motion Energy Analysis (MEA) to quantify BtBC between learners and instructors who used two different instructional approaches to teach psychological concepts. BtBC was significantly greater when the instructor employed a scaffolding approach than when an explanation approach was used. The importance of the instructional approach was further underscored by the fact that an increase in motion in the instructor was associated with boosted BtBC, but only during scaffolding; no such relationship between the instructor movements and BtBC was found during explanation interactions. Finally, leveraging machine learning approaches (i.e., support vector and logistic regression models), we demonstrated that both learning outcome and instructional approaches could be decoded based on BtBC. Collectively, these results show that the real-time interaction of teaching and learning bodies is important for learning and that the instructional approach matters, with possible implications for both in-person and online learning.

Identifiers

PMID35764662
PMCPMC9240028
OpenAlexW4283644183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.