Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764404›Full record

ArticleNeurology2022

Short- and Long-term Central Action of Botulinum Neurotoxin Treatment in Laryngeal Dystonia.

Lena C O'Flynn, Kristina Simonyan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Brain network pathophysiology in dystonia.Dystonia (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  4. Genetic Update and Treatment for Dystonia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Basis of movement control in dystonia and why botulinum toxin should influence it?Toxicon : official journal of the International Society on Toxinology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lena C O'FlynnFrom the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (L.C.O., K.S.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School; Program in Speech Hearing Bioscience and Technology (L.C.O., K.S.), Harvard University; and Department of Neurology (K.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Kristina SimonyanFrom the Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (L.C.O., K.S.), Massachusetts Eye and Ear and Harvard Medical School; Program in Speech Hearing Bioscience and Technology (L.C.O., K.S.), Harvard University; and Department of Neurology (K.S.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston. kristina_simonyan@meei.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7444-0437
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

Imaging genetics of spasmodic dysphoniaR01DC011805 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Kristina Simonyan · 2012 to 2026
$8.8M
Voice tremor in spasmodic dysphonia: central mechanisms and treatment responseR01DC012545 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI SIMONYAN, KRISTINA · 2012 to 2021
$5.2M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011805NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012545
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesLaryngeal dystonia (LD) is isolated task-specific focal dystonia selectively impairing speech production. The first choice of LD treatment is botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT) injections into the affected laryngeal muscles. However, whether BoNT has a lasting therapeutic effect on disorder pathophysiology is unknown. We investigated short-term and long-term effects of BoNT treatment on brain function in patients with LD.

methodsA total of 161 participants were included in the functional MRI study. Statistical analyses examined central BoNT effects in patients with LD who were stratified based on the effectiveness and duration of treatment.

resultsPatients with LD who were treated and benefited from BoNT injections had reduced activity in the left precuneus compared with BoNT-naive and treatment nonbenefiting patients. In addition, BoNT-treated patients with adductor LD had decreased activity in the right thalamus, whereas BoNT-treated abductor patients with LD had reduced activity in the left inferior frontal cortex. No statistically significant differences in brain activity were found between patients with shorter (1-5 years) and longer (13-28 years) treatment durations. However, patients with intermediate treatment duration of 6-12 years showed reduced activity in the right cerebellum compared with patients with both shorter and longer treatment durations and reduced activity in the right prefrontal cortex compared with patients with shorter treatment duration. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest that the left precuneus is the site of short-term BoNT central action in patients with LD, whereas the prefrontal-cerebellar axis is engaged in the BoNT response in patients with intermediate treatment duration of 6-12 years. Involvement of these structures points to indirect action of BoNT treatment on the dystonic sensorimotor network through modulation of motor sequence planning and coordination.

Indexed as

Botulinum Toxins, Type ADystoniaDystonic DisordersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurotoxinsBotulinum Toxins, Type ANeurotoxins

Identifiers

PMID35764404
PMCPMC9536744
OpenAlexW4283699336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.