Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35764367›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2022

Therapeutic efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates targeting GD2-positive tumors.

Daniel V Kalinovsky, Alexey V Kibardin, Irina V Kholodenko, Elena V Svirshchevskaya, Igor I Doronin, Mariya V Konovalova, Maria V Grechikhina, Fedor N Rozov, Sergey S Larin, Sergey M Deyev and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Ganglioside GD2 Contributes to a Stem-Like Phenotype in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel V KalinovskyDepartment of Immunology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-8773-2797
Alexey V KibardinDmitriy Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Irina V KholodenkoOrekhovich Institute of Biomedical Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
Elena V SvirshchevskayaDepartment of Immunology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Igor I DoroninDepartment of Immunology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Mariya V KonovalovaDepartment of Immunology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-3923-6304
Maria V GrechikhinaDepartment of Immunology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Fedor N RozovLomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey S LarinDmitriy Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey M DeyevDepartment of Immunology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Roman V KholodenkoDepartment of Immunology, Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia khol@mail.ru.ORCID 0000-0001-6083-6588
Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry · RUDmitry Rogachev National Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Immunology · RUInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry · RULomonosov Moscow State University · RUSechenov University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth ganglioside GD2-targeted immunotherapy and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) have demonstrated clinical success as solid tumor therapies in recent years, yet no research has been carried out to develop anti-GD2 ADCs against solid tumors. This is the first study to analyze cytotoxic activity of clinically relevant anti-GD2 ADCs in a wide panel of cell lines with varying GD2 expression and their effects in mouse models of GD2-positive solid cancer.

methodsAnti-GD2 ADCs were generated based on the GD2-specific antibody ch14.18 approved for the treatment of neuroblastoma and commonly used drugs monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) or F (MMAF), conjugated via a cleavable linker by thiol-maleimide chemistry. The antibody was produced in a mammalian expression system, and its specific binding to GD2 was analyzed. Antigen-binding properties and biodistribution of the ADCs in mice were studied in comparison with the parent antibody. Cytotoxic effects of the ADCs were evaluated in a wide panel of GD2-positive and GD2-negative tumor cell lines of neuroblastoma, glioma, sarcoma, melanoma, and breast cancer. Their antitumor effects were studied in the B78-D14 melanoma and EL-4 lymphoma syngeneic mouse models.

resultsThe ch14.18-MMAE and ch14.18-MMAF ADCs retained antigen-binding properties of the parent antibody. Direct dependence of the cytotoxic effect on the level of GD2 expression was observed in cell lines of different origin for both ADCs, with IC50 below 1 nM for the cells with high GD2 expression and no cytotoxic effect for GD2-negative cells. Within the analyzed cell lines, ch14.18-MMAF was more effective in the cells overexpressing GD2, while ch14.18-MMAE had more prominent activity in the cells expressing low GD2 levels. The ADCs had a similar biodistribution profile in the B78-D14 melanoma model compared with the parent antibody, reaching 7.7% ID/g in the tumor at 48 hours postinjection. The average tumor size in groups treated with ch14.18-MMAE or ch14.18-MMAF was 2.6 times and 3.8 times smaller, respectively, compared with the control group. Antitumor effects of the anti-GD2 ADCs were also confirmed in the EL-4 lymphoma model.

conclusionThese findings validate the potential of ADCs targeting ganglioside GD2 in treating multiple GD2-expressing solid tumors.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsImmunoconjugatesMelanomaNeuroblastomaAnimalsGangliosidesMammalsMiceTissue DistributionAntineoplastic AgentsGangliosidesImmunoconjugatesantigens, tumor-associated, carbohydratebrain neoplasmsbreast neoplasmsimmunotherapyneuroblastoma

Identifiers

PMID35764367
PMCPMC9240879
OpenAlexW4283735462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.