ArticleJournal of pain and symptom management2022
National End-of-Life-Treatment Preferences are Stable Over Time: National Health and Aging Trends Study.
Article in Journal of pain and symptom management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Life-Prolonging Treatment Preferences and Their Association With Health Care Utilization and End-Of-Life Experiences in Older Adults.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextAdvance Care Planning is a process of understanding and sharing preferences regarding future medical care.
objectiveTo explore individual and national stability of end-of-life treatment preferences among a sample of older adults.
methodsNational Health and Aging Trends Study is a nationally representative sample of older adults. In 2012, a random sample, and in 2018, the entire sample were queried on end-of-life treatment preferences defined as acceptance or rejection of life prolonging treatment (LPT) if they had a serious illness and were at the end of their life and in severe pain or had severe disability. Using a cohort design, we explored individual trends in preferences for LPT among those with responses in both waves (pain scenario: N = 606, disability scenario: N = 628) and, using a serial cross-sectional design, national trends in LPT among the entire sample (1702 older adults in wave 2 and 4342 in wave 8).
resultsIn the cohort study, individual preferences were stable over time (overall percent agreement = 86% for disability and 76% for pain scenarios), particularly for older adults who would reject LPT in wave 2 (overall agreement 92% for disability and 86% for pain). In the serial cross-sectional study, national trends in preferences for receipt of LPT were stable over time in the pain (27.4% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.80) and disability (15.8% vs. 15.7%, P = 0.99) scenarios.
conclusionsWe found that national trends in preferences for end-of-life treatment did not substantially change over time and may be stable within individual older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.