ArticleAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022
Geographic Variability of Gastric Cancer Incidence in Kazakhstan.
Article in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A single-center culture-based study ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal analysis of gastric cancer incidence in Iran from 2014 to 2018: a geospatial epidemiological study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The Role of State Policy in Addressing Cancer Trends: A Case Study from the Akmola Region.Iranian journal of public health · 2025Article
- Review of Methods for DetectionJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- A Study of the Effectiveness of Apoptosis Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Gastric Cancer in Kazakhstan: A Review of Systematic Evidence.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe article studies the geographical features of the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) in Kazakhstan.
methodsThe retrospective study was done for the period 2009-2018. Descriptive and analytical methods of oncoepidemiology were used. Crude (CR), age-specific (ASIR), age-standardized (ASR), equalized incidence rates and approximation were calculated. The dynamics of indicators was investigated using component analysis according to methodological recommendations. The method of drawing up a cartogram based on the determination of the standard deviation (σ) from the mean (x) was applied.
resultsDuring the study period, 27,467 new cases of GC were registered. The incidence rate increased from 16.80 (2009) to 15.10 in 2018 and the overall decline was 1.70 per 100,000 population, including due to the age structure - ∑ΔA=+1.51, due to the risk of acquiring illness - ∑ΔR=-2.91 and their combined effect - ∑ΔRA=-0.31. The component analysis revealed that the increase in the number of patients with GC was mainly due to the growth of the population (ΔP=+651.8%), changes in its age structure (ΔA=+433.9%) and changes associated with the risk of acquiring illness (ΔR=-832.1%). The cartograms were allocated according to the following criteria: low - up to 14.80/0000, average - from 14.8 to 19.20/0000, high - above 19.20/0000. The results of the spatial assessment showed the highest levels of GC incidence in following regions: Akmola (22.20/0000), North Kazakhstan (22.30/0000), and Pavlodar (23.20/0000).
conclusionThus, as a result of the epidemiological analysis, the role of the influence of demographic factors and the risk of acquiring illness on the formation of the number of patients and the incidence of GC was evaluated, while sex differences and geographical variability were established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.