Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35763622›Full record

SynthesisAsian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP2022

Cholangiocarcinoma Attributed to Occupation: A Systematic Reviews.

Annantapat Seeherunwong, Naesinee Chaiear, Narong Khuntikeo, Chatchai Ekpanyaskul

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Update on Occupational Cancer for Better Cancer Prevention and Control.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Review
  3. Impact of sleep on gastrointestinal cancer.World journal of clinical oncology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annantapat SeeherunwongDepartment of Community, Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0003-0959-4354
Naesinee ChaiearDepartment of Community, Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2613-6833
Narong KhuntikeoCholangiocarcinoma Screening and Care Program (CASCAP), Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9305-0688
Chatchai EkpanyaskulDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-9832
Khon Kaen University · THSrinakharinwirot University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe occurrence of a cluster of occupational cholangiocarcinoma(CCA) cases among Japanese workers at a small offset printing plant led to the hypotheses that occupational exposure was the root cause of this cancer. Numerous workplace carcinogens can be found at various jobs sites and are integral to various industrial processes. Therefore, a systematic evaluation of potential occupationally-related CCA and likely exposure types is needed.

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review on the cause of CCA in relation to occupation.

methodsThe systematic review included papers published between 1980 and 2020. Databases included PubMed, Science Direct, CINAHL, ProQuest Medical Library, Springer, Wiley online library, and the Cochrane library. The review focused on CCA, intrahepatic CCA(as distinct from other types of liver cancer), and extrahepatic CCA(not including the gallbladder). While some occupations involve an expected risk of exposure to carcinogens, this study sought both primary reports on specific carcinogens or surrogates by occupation or industry title. Of the 65 English version abstracts, 18 studies were selected for in-depth review according to the eligibility criteria. Two occupational physicians independently assessed the relevance to the study objectives, data extractability, and data quality as per the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

resultsThe review revealed that ten observational studies met the eligibility criteria. There was heterogeneity of occupational exposure assessment and the reported results. The possible carcinogens statistical significantly related to the incidence or mortality of CCA risk included 1,2-dichloropropane (the highest RR = 32.40, 95%CI=6.40-163.90), asbestos (the highest OR=4.81, 95 % CI =1.73-13.33), endocrine-disrupting compounds (the highest OR =2.00, 95% CI=1.10-3.70), and rotating shift work (the highest HR =1.97, 95%CI=1.02-3.79). These carcinogens are classified as IARC class 1 and 2A.

conclusionsDespite the limited number of studies reviewed, the hypothesis of occupational risk for CCA was supported. Occupational health and safety measures may decrease exposure to these carcinogens, and surveillance in high-risk occupations or industries is urgently needed to prevent and control CCA.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaBile Ducts, IntrahepaticCarcinogensHumansOccupationsCarcinogensbile duct neoplasmscholangiocarcinomaoccupational diseaseOCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE

Identifiers

PMID35763622
PMCPMC9587819
OpenAlexW4283652118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.