ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2022
An automatic method to generate voxel-based absorbed doses from radioactivity distributions for nuclear medicine using generative adversarial networks: a feasibility study.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Re-evaluation ofPhysical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An approach to autogenerate voxel-based absorbed dose for nuclear medicine is proposed using generative adversarial networks. The method is based on image-to-image transformation and promises to achieve real-time visualization of the absorbed dose and optimization of therapeutic strategies. The activity-density superimposed image is input to generator (G) as a reference image to generate a pseudoabsorbed dose image (DI), which is then mixed with ground truth (GT) DI and recognized by discriminator (D). If the pseudoimage is recognized, the information is fed back, and G regenerates a pseudodose image until D drops to obtain a lifelike DI. As a feasibility study, we used the dose distribution of segmented human anatomy from different sources and activities as training and test datasets. The activity source was assumed to be 1, 2, 3, 4, or 7 subsource blocks. The 3-subsource model was used as the test dataset, and the others were used as the training dataset. The activity distribution in the subsource was assumed to be uniform or heterogeneous (i.e., Gaussian diffusion with sigma 0.0, 0.3, or 0.6). Differences were assessed by Gamma analysis. Results showed that the same or quasi-inhomogeneity model can well predict the dose distribution of different activity-inhomogeneity. Although the 1-source model was trained with very few datasets, it showed an optimal balance between accuracy and training efficiency. There were offsets in the mean absorbed dose between the predicted and GT, but they all showed a higher Gamma-pass-rate (> 93%) and ~ 10% std.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35763194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.