Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35763103›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2022

Animation Supported Consent Before Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Emre Doganay, David S Wald, Sam Parker, Frances Hughes

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emre DoganayDepartment of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Newark Street, London, E1 2AA, UK. emre.doganay@nhs.net.ORCID 0000-0003-1278-5493
David S WaldPopulation Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0QT, UK.
Sam ParkerDepartment of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Newark Street, London, E1 2AA, UK.
Frances HughesDepartment of Surgery, The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, Newark Street, London, E1 2AA, UK.
Barts Health NHS Trust · GBSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient understanding of surgical procedures is often incomplete at the time they are performed, invalidating consent, and exposing healthcare providers to complaints and claims of failure to inform. Remote consultations, language barriers and patient factors can hinder an effective consent pathway. New approaches are needed to support communication and shared decision-making.

methodsMulti-language digital animations explaining laparoscopic cholecystectomy were introduced at The Royal London Hospital for patients who attended for elective surgery ( www.explainmyprocedure.com/lapchole ). Patients completed questionnaires on the day of their procedure both before and after introduction of the animations. We assessed patient-reported understanding of the procedure, its intended benefits, the possible risks, and alternatives to treatment in 72 consecutive patients, 37 before (no animation group) and after 35 after introducing the animations into the consent pathway (animation group). Patient understanding in the two groups was compared.

resultsThe two groups were well matched in respect of age, sex and whether English was their first spoken language. The proportions of patients who reported they completely understood the procedure, its benefits, risks, and alternatives in the no animation group were 54, 57, 38 and 24% and in the animation group, 91, 91, 74 and 77%, respectively; p < 0.01 for each comparison.

conclusionThe integration of multi-language laparoscopic cholecystectomy video animations into the patient consent pathway was associated with substantial improvement in reported understanding of the procedure, benefits, risks, and alternatives to treatment. This approach can be applied across all surgical disciplines in a standardised manner in an era of accelerated elective work and remote consultations.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCommunicationCommunication BarriersElective Surgical ProceduresHumansInformed Consent

Identifiers

PMID35763103
PMCPMC9244138
OpenAlexW4283643381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.