Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35763053›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2022

Preoperative prediction of pelvic lymph nodes metastasis in prostate cancer using an ADC-based radiomics model: comparison with clinical nomograms and PI-RADS assessment.

Xiang Liu, Xiangpeng Wang, Yaofeng Zhang, Zhaonan Sun, Xiaodong Zhang, Xiaoying Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Semiautomated pelvic lymph node treatment response evaluation for patients with advanced prostate cancer: based on MET-RADS-P guidelines.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiang LiuDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiangpeng WangBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., No. 24, Huangsi Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100011, China.
Yaofeng ZhangBeijing Smart Tree Medical Technology Co. Ltd., No. 24, Huangsi Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100011, China.
Zhaonan SunDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaodong ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China.
Xiaoying WangDepartment of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, Beijing, 100034, China. wangxiaoying@bjmu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9822-961X
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop and test radiomics models based on manually corrected or automatically gained masks on ADC maps for pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) prediction in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

methodsA primary cohort of 474 patients with PCa who underwent prostate mpMRI were retrospectively enrolled for PLNM prediction between January 2017 and January 2020. They were then randomly split into training/validation (n = 332) and test (n = 142) groups for model development and internal testing. Four radiomics models were developed using four masks (manually corrected/automatic prostate gland and PCa lesion segmentation) based on the ADC maps using the primary cohort. Another cohort of 128 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for PCa was used as the testing cohort between February 2020 and October 2021. The performance of the models was evaluated in terms of discrimination and clinical usefulness using the area under the curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA). The optimal radiomics model was further compared with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) and Briganti 2017 nomograms, and PI-RADS assessment.

results17 (13.28%) Patients with PLNM were included in the testing cohort. The radiomics model based on the mask of automatically segmented prostate obtained the highest AUC among the four radiomics models (0.73 vs. 0.63 vs. 0.70 vs. 0.56). Briganti 2017, MSKCC nomograms, and PI-RADS assessment-yielded AUCs of 0.69, 0.71, and 0.70, respectively, and no significant differences were found compared with the optimal radiomics model (P = 0.605-0.955).

conclusionThe radiomics model based on the mask of automatically segmented prostate offers a non-invasive method to predict PLNM for patients with PCa. It shows comparable accuracy to the current MKSCC and Briganti nomograms.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNomogramsRetrospective StudiesApparent diffusion coefficient mapsPelvic lymph node metastasisProstate cancerRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID35763053
OpenAlexW4283660617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.