Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35763041›Full record

Trial reportClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2022

Extracellular Vesicles May Predict Response to Radioembolization and Sorafenib Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Exploratory Analysis from the SORAMIC Trial.

Timothy Wai Ho Shuen, Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni, Elif Öcal, Peter Malfertheiner, Moritz Wildgruber, Regina Schinner, Maciej Pech, Julia Benckert, Bruno Sangro, Christiane Kuhl and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Timothy Wai Ho Shuen *Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Marianna Alunni-Fabbroni *Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9710-1662
Elif ÖcalDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Peter MalfertheinerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8439-9036
Moritz WildgruberDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Regina SchinnerDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Maciej PechDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7140-6775
Julia BenckertDepartment of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany.
Bruno SangroLiver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4177-6417
Christiane KuhlUniversity Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8696-2363
Antonio GasbarriniInternal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatic Disease Unit, IRCCS Fondazione; Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Pierce Kah Hoe ChowDivision of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, National Cancer Centre Singapore and Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0003-0584-2584
Han Chong Toh *Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore.
Jens Ricke *Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8762-8594
LMU Klinikum · DENational Cancer Centre Singapore · SGCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESDuke-NUS Medical School · SGRWTH Aachen University · DEUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSORAMIC is a randomized controlled trial in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing sorafenib ± selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). We investigated the value of extracellular vesicle (EV)-based proteomics for treatment response prediction. EXPERIMENTAL

designThe analysis population comprised 25 patients receiving SIRT+sorafenib and 20 patients receiving sorafenib alone. Patients were classified as responders or nonresponders based on changes in AFP and imaging or overall survival. Proteomic analysis was performed on plasma EVs by LC/MS, followed by bioinformatics analysis. Clinical relevance of candidate EV proteins was validated by survival and receiver-operating characteristic analysis with bootstrap internal sampling validation. Origin of circulating EV was explored by IHC staining of liver and tumor tissues and transcriptomics of blood cells.

resultsProteomic analysis identified 56 and 27 EV proteins that were differentially expressed in plasma EVs between responders and nonresponders receiving SIRT+sorafenib and sorafenib alone, respectively. High EV-GPX3/ACTR3 and low EV-ARHGAP1 were identified as candidate biomarkers at baseline from the 13 responders to SIRT+sorafenib with statistically significant AUC = 1 for all and bootstrap P values 2.23 × 10-5, 2.22 × 10-5, and 2.23 × 10-5, respectively. These patients showed reduced abundance of EV-VPS13A and EV-KALRN 6 to 9 weeks after combined treatment with significant AUC and bootstrap P values. In reverse, low GPX3 and high ARHGAP1 demonstrated better response to sorafenib monotherapy with AUC = 0.9697 and 0.9192 as well as bootstrap P values 8.34 × 10-5 and 7.98 × 10-4, respectively. HCC tumor was the likely origin of circulating EVs.

conclusionsIn this exploratory study, EV-based proteomics predicted response to SIRT+sorafenib and sorafenib-only treatment in patients with advanced HCC of metabolic origin.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularExtracellular VesiclesLiver NeoplasmsSorafenibHumansNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsProteomicsNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID35763041
PMCPMC9433961
OpenAlexW4283662815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.