ArticleLab on a chip2022
Characterization of wax valving and μPIV analysis of microscale flow in paper-fluidic devices for improved modeling and design.
Article in Lab on a chip, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A multiplexed, allele-specific recombinase polymerase amplification assay with lateral flow readout for sickle cell disease detection.Lab on a chip · 2024Article
- Paper based microfluidic devices: a review of fabrication techniques and applications.The European physical journal. Special topics · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Paper-fluidic devices are a popular platform for point-of-care diagnostics due to their low cost, ease of use, and equipment-free detection of target molecules. They are limited, however, by their lack of sensitivity and inability to incorporate more complex processes, such as nucleic acid amplification or enzymatic signal enhancement. To address these limitations, various valves have previously been implemented in paper-fluidic devices to control fluid obstruction and release. However, incorporation of valves into new devices is a highly iterative, time-intensive process due to limited experimental data describing the microscale flow that drives the biophysical reactions in the assay. In this paper, we tested and modeled different geometries of thermally actuated valves to investigate how they can be more easily implemented in an LFIA with precise control of actuation time, flow rate, and flow pattern. We demonstrate that bulk flow measurements alone cannot estimate the highly variable microscale properties and effects on LFIA signal development. To further quantify the microfluidic properties of paper-fluidic devices, micro-particle image velocimetry was used to quantify fluorescent nanoparticle flow through the membranes and demonstrated divergent properties from bulk flow that may explain additional variability in LFIA signal generation. Altogether, we demonstrate that a more robust characterization of paper-fluidic devices can permit fine-tuning of parameters for precise automation of multi-step assays and inform analytical models for more efficient design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.