ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
Improving candidate Biosynthetic Gene Clusters in fungi through reinforcement learning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combating Antibacterial Resistance: The Integrative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Bio-Based Product Development.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Benchmarking methods for measuring biosynthetic gene cluster similarity and determination of gene cluster families.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Analyzing the Challenges and Opportunities Associated With Harnessing New Antibiotics From the Fungal Microbiome.MicrobiologyOpen · 2025Review
- Exploring the secrets of marine microorganisms: Unveiling secondary metabolites through metagenomics.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- Enhancing chemical and biological diversity by co-cultivation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationPrecise identification of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) is a challenging task. Performance of BGC discovery tools is limited by their capacity to accurately predict components belonging to candidate BGCs, often overestimating cluster boundaries. To support optimizing the composition and boundaries of candidate BGCs, we propose reinforcement learning approach relying on protein domains and functional annotations from expert curated BGCs.
resultsThe proposed reinforcement learning method aims to improve candidate BGCs obtained with state-of-the-art tools. It was evaluated on candidate BGCs obtained for two fungal genomes, Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus nidulans. The results highlight an improvement of the gene precision by above 15% for TOUCAN, fungiSMASH and DeepBGC; and cluster precision by above 25% for fungiSMASH and DeepBCG, allowing these tools to obtain almost perfect precision in cluster prediction. This can pave the way of optimizing current prediction of candidate BGCs in fungi, while minimizing the curation effort required by domain experts. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/bioinfoUQAM/RL-bgc-components. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.