ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022
Segmentation and Evaluation of Corneal Nerves and Dendritic Cells From In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images Using Deep Learning.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Annotated Corneal Confocal Microscopy Dataset for Nerve Segmentation and Clinical Characterization.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Corneal Nerve Images in Ophthalmology.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Emerging Technologies in Corneal Nerve Evaluation for Dry Eye and Ocular Surface Disease: A Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-Assisted detection of corneal nerve structural abnormalities in early diabetic keratopathy: development and validation of a deep learning framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based segmentation and density estimation of corneal nerves and dendritic cells from In Vivo confocal microscopy images.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review Comparing Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Diagnostic Approaches for Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Article
- Advances in ocular aging: combining deep learning, imaging, and liquid biopsy biomarkers.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Corneal subbasal nerve alterations and tear cytokine associations in ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Segmentation and multiparametric evaluation of corneal whorl-like nerves for in vivo confocal microscopy images in dry eye disease.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Multimodal Approach in Dry Eye Disease Combining In Vivo Confocal Microscopy and HLA-DR Expression.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Article
- Artificial-Intelligence-Enhanced Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Corneal Diseases: A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Potential applications of artificial intelligence in image analysis in cornea diseases: a review.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Review
- Automated identification and quantification of activated dendritic cells in central cornea using artificial intelligence.The ocular surface · 2023Article
- In-vivo corneal confocal microscopy: Imaging analysis, biological insights and future directions.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Evaluation of a computer-aided diagnostic model for corneal diseases by analyzingFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Integration of Artificial Intelligence into the Approach for Diagnosis and Monitoring of Dry Eye Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Dry Eye: Workflows, Effectiveness, and Evaluation.Journal of current ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Segmentation and evaluation of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images requires manual intervention, which is time consuming, laborious, and non-reproducible. The aim of this research was to develop and validate deep learning-based methods that could automatically segment and evaluate corneal nerve fibers (CNFs) and dendritic cells (DCs) in IVCM images, thereby reducing processing time to analyze larger volumes of clinical images. Methods: CNF and DC segmentation models were developed based on U-Net and Mask R-CNN architectures, respectively; 10-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate both models. The CNF model was trained and tested using 1097 and 122 images, and the DC model was trained and tested using 679 and 75 images, respectively, at each fold. The CNF morphology, number of nerves, number of branching points, nerve length, and tortuosity were analyzed; for DCs, number, size, and immature-mature cells were analyzed. Python-based software was written for model training, testing, and automatic morphometric parameters evaluation. Results: The CNF model achieved on average 86.1% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity, and the DC model achieved on average 89.37% precision, 94.43% recall, and 91.83% F1 score. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between manual annotation and automatic segmentation were 0.85, 0.87, 0.95, and 0.88 for CNF number, length, branching points, and tortuosity, respectively, and the ICC for DC number and size were 0.95 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusions: Our proposed methods demonstrated reliable consistency between manual annotation and automatic segmentation of CNF and DC with rapid speed. The results showed that these approaches have the potential to be implemented into clinical practice in IVCM images. Translational Relevance: The deep learning-based automatic segmentation and quantification algorithm significantly increases the efficiency of evaluating IVCM images, thereby supporting and potentially improving the diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disease associated with corneal nerves and dendritic cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.