Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35762938›Full record

ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2022

Segmentation and Evaluation of Corneal Nerves and Dendritic Cells From In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Images Using Deep Learning.

Md Asif Khan Setu, Stefan Schmidt, Gwen Musial, Michael E Stern, Philipp Steven

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Md Asif Khan SetuDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Stefan SchmidtHeidelberg Engineering GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany.
Gwen MusialDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Michael E SternDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Philipp StevenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Segmentation and evaluation of in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) images requires manual intervention, which is time consuming, laborious, and non-reproducible. The aim of this research was to develop and validate deep learning-based methods that could automatically segment and evaluate corneal nerve fibers (CNFs) and dendritic cells (DCs) in IVCM images, thereby reducing processing time to analyze larger volumes of clinical images. Methods: CNF and DC segmentation models were developed based on U-Net and Mask R-CNN architectures, respectively; 10-fold cross-validation was used to evaluate both models. The CNF model was trained and tested using 1097 and 122 images, and the DC model was trained and tested using 679 and 75 images, respectively, at each fold. The CNF morphology, number of nerves, number of branching points, nerve length, and tortuosity were analyzed; for DCs, number, size, and immature-mature cells were analyzed. Python-based software was written for model training, testing, and automatic morphometric parameters evaluation. Results: The CNF model achieved on average 86.1% sensitivity and 90.1% specificity, and the DC model achieved on average 89.37% precision, 94.43% recall, and 91.83% F1 score. The interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) between manual annotation and automatic segmentation were 0.85, 0.87, 0.95, and 0.88 for CNF number, length, branching points, and tortuosity, respectively, and the ICC for DC number and size were 0.95 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusions: Our proposed methods demonstrated reliable consistency between manual annotation and automatic segmentation of CNF and DC with rapid speed. The results showed that these approaches have the potential to be implemented into clinical practice in IVCM images. Translational Relevance: The deep learning-based automatic segmentation and quantification algorithm significantly increases the efficiency of evaluating IVCM images, thereby supporting and potentially improving the diagnosis and treatment of ocular surface disease associated with corneal nerves and dendritic cells.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsCorneaDendritic CellsMicroscopy, Confocal

Identifiers

PMID35762938
PMCPMC9251793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.