ArticleTherapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease
Imaging of left heart intracardiac thrombus: clinical needs, current imaging, and emerging cardiac magnetic resonance techniques.
Article in Therapeutic advances in cardiovascular disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unmasking the Apex: Multimodality Imaging for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Apical Obliteration.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Early Prediction of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Acute Stroke Using the BANQMR Score.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Rapid progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to cardiac amyloidosis with intracardiac thrombus: Unveiling via cardiac magnetic resonance.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- The Development of a Nomogram Predictive Model for Intracardiac Thrombosis Risk: A Study Based on Risk Factors in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Cardiac thrombus in acute ischemic stroke: impact on endovascular thrombectomy utilization.Thrombosis journal · 2024Article
- A Peculiar Case of Rapidly Recurring Metastasis of Malignant Non-small Cell Primary Lung Carcinoma to the Heart.Cureus · 2024Article
- MRI in the Evaluation of Cryptogenic Stroke and Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.Radiology · 2024Review
- Current Perspectives on Atrial Amyloidosis: A Narrative Review.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- An Interesting Case of Possible Left Atrium Thrombus Versus Fungal Mass in a Patient With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.Cureus · 2023Article
- Cardioembolic stroke in cardiac amyloidosis: the real challenge lies beyond heart rhythm.European heart journal. Case reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracardiac thrombus in the left atrium and atrial appendage (LA/LAA) and left ventricle (LV) increases the risk of systemic thromboembolism and causes potentially devastating diseases such as ischemic stroke and acute ischemia in abdominal organs and lower extremities. Detecting the presence and monitoring the resolution of left heart intracardiac thrombus are of vital importance for stratifying patients and guiding treatment decisions. Currently, echocardiography is the most frequently used method for the above clinical needs, followed by computed tomography. An increasing number of studies have been performed to investigate the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as an alternative imaging modality given its several unique strengths. This article provides an overview of the clinical relevance of the LA/LAA and LV thrombus as well as the diagnostic performance of the current imaging modalities and emerging CMR techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.