ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2022
A unified statistical potential reveals that amino acid stickiness governs nonspecific recruitment of client proteins into condensates.
Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Designed IDPs phase separate and mix or demix according to sequence designed parameters.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Hydration free energy is an incomplete predictor of globular protein incorporation into condensates.Biophysical journal · 2026Article
- Mapping interactions between disordered regions reveals promiscuity in biomolecular condensate formation.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Molecular determinants of arginine versus lysine cation-π interactions in biomolecular condensates.Communications chemistry · 2026Article
- A composition-matching algorithm, MatchIDR, identifies prion-like domains that localize to stress granules.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Beyond contacts: The important role of the support region in protein complex assembly.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Article
- Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation in Major Hallmarks of Cancer.Cell proliferation · 2026Review
- Nuclear pore passage of the HIV capsid is driven by its unusual surface amino acid composition.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2025Article
- Ubiquilin-2 liquid droplets catalyze α-synuclein fibril formation.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- Kinase signaling cascades: an updated mechanistic landscape.Chemical science · 2025Review
- Comprehensive protein datasets and benchmarking for liquid-liquid phase separation studies.Genome biology · 2025Article
- catGRANULE 2.0: accurate predictions of liquid-liquid phase separating proteins at single amino acid resolution.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Molecular evidence that GBS early neonatal sepsis results from ascending infection: comparative hybrid genomics analyses show that microorganisms in the vaginal ecosystem, amniotic fluid, chorioamniotic membranes, and neonatal blood are the same.Journal of perinatal medicine · 2024Article
- Rational Tuning of the Concentration-independent Enrichment of Prion-like Domains in Stress Granules.Journal of molecular biology · 2024Article
- Seq2Phase: language model-based accurate prediction of client proteins in liquid-liquid phase separation.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
- Mapping the energy landscape of PROTAC-mediated protein-protein interactions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Article
- A unified statistical potential reveals that amino acid stickiness governs nonspecific recruitment of client proteins into condensates.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Membraneless organelles are cellular compartments that form by liquid-liquid phase separation of one or more components. Other molecules, such as proteins and nucleic acids, will distribute between the cytoplasm and the liquid compartment in accordance with the thermodynamic drive to lower the free energy of the system. The resulting distribution colocalizes molecular species to carry out a diversity of functions. Two factors could drive this partitioning: the difference in solvation between the dilute versus dense phase and intermolecular interactions between the client and scaffold proteins. Here, we develop a set of knowledge-based potentials that allow for the direct comparison between stickiness, which is dominated by desolvation energy, and pairwise residue contact propensity terms. We use these scales to examine experimental data from two systems: protein cargo dissolving within phase-separated droplets made from FG repeat proteins of the nuclear pore complex and client proteins dissolving within phase-separated FUS droplets. These analyses reveal a close agreement between the stickiness of the client proteins and the experimentally determined values of the partition coefficients (R > 0.9), while pairwise residue contact propensities between client and scaffold show weaker correlations. Hence, the stickiness of client proteins is sufficient to explain their differential partitioning within these two phase-separated systems without taking into account the composition of the condensate. This result implies that selective trafficking of client proteins to distinct membraneless organelles requires recognition elements beyond the client sequence composition. STATEMENT: Empirical potentials for amino acid stickiness and pairwise residue contact propensities are derived. These scales are unique in that they enable direct comparison of desolvation versus contact terms. We find that partitioning of a client protein to a condensate is best explained by amino acid stickiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.