Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35762454›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2022

Nonlinear functional network connectivity in resting functional magnetic resonance imaging data.

Sara M Motlaghian, Aysenil Belger, Juan R Bustillo, Judith M Ford, Armin Iraji, Kelvin Lim, Daniel H Mathalon, Bryon A Mueller, Daniel O'Leary, Godfrey Pearlson and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Connectivity analyses for task-based fMRI.Physics of life reviews · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sara M MotlaghianTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State, Georgia Tech, Emory, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1533-0091
Aysenil BelgerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Juan R BustilloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA.
Judith M FordDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Armin IrajiTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State, Georgia Tech, Emory, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Kelvin LimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2390-7268
Daniel H MathalonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Bryon A MuellerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Daniel O'LearyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Godfrey PearlsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Steven G PotkinDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Adrian PredaDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Theo G M van ErpDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, USA.
Vince D CalhounTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State, Georgia Tech, Emory, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
Male/Female differences in psychosis and mood disorders:Dynamic imaging-genomic models for characterizing and predicting psychosis and mood dR01MH118695 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2019 to 2023
$3.8M
Data-driven solutions for temporal, spatial, and spatiotemporal dynamic functional connectivityR01MH123610 · NIMH · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIH Clinical Center R01EB006841NIH Clinical Center R01MH118695NIH Clinical Center R01MH123610NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH118695NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH123610
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this work, we focus on explicitly nonlinear relationships in functional networks. We introduce a technique using normalized mutual information (NMI) that calculates the nonlinear relationship between different brain regions. We demonstrate our proposed approach using simulated data and then apply it to a dataset previously studied by Damaraju et al. This resting-state fMRI data included 151 schizophrenia patients and 163 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. We first decomposed these data using group independent component analysis (ICA) and yielded 47 functionally relevant intrinsic connectivity networks. Our analysis showed a modularized nonlinear relationship among brain functional networks that was particularly noticeable in the sensory and visual cortex. Interestingly, the modularity appears both meaningful and distinct from that revealed by the linear approach. Group analysis identified significant differences in explicitly nonlinear functional network connectivity (FNC) between schizophrenia patients and healthy controls, particularly in the visual cortex, with controls showing more nonlinearity (i.e., higher normalized mutual information between time courses with linear relationships removed) in most cases. Certain domains, including subcortical and auditory, showed relatively less nonlinear FNC (i.e., lower normalized mutual information), whereas links between the visual and other domains showed evidence of substantial nonlinear and modular properties. Overall, these results suggest that quantifying nonlinear dependencies of functional connectivity may provide a complementary and potentially important tool for studying brain function by exposing relevant variation that is typically ignored. Beyond this, we propose a method that captures both linear and nonlinear effects in a "boosted" approach. This method increases the sensitivity to group differences compared to the standard linear approach, at the cost of being unable to separate linear and nonlinear effects.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaVisual CortexBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRestfunctional network connectivitymutual informationnonlinear functional network connectivitytime courses

Identifiers

PMID35762454
PMCPMC9491296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.