Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35762376›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2022

How could HIV-1 drug resistance impact preexposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention?

Urvi M Parikh, John W Mellors

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06133686 (Implementing Oral), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06133686 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementing Oral (Event-driven and Daily) and Long-acting Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in Mobile Men in Sub-Saharan Africa: a Phase 3b, Open-label, Hybrid Type 2 Implementation and Effectiveness Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research UnitRan2024 to 2027Enrolled400ConditionsHIVArmsTenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF-FTC), cabotegravir (CAB-LA), Cabotegravir (CAB-LA), Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF-FTC)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Analytical and Clinical Performance of VIDASDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. The Critical Importance of Clinical Use Case to Inform Point-of-Care Technology Development: A Case Study of HIV Nucleic Acid Assays in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. HIV-1 testing in the context of expanding PrEP modalities.Journal of the International AIDS Society · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. ACS infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Urvi M ParikhDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
John W Mellors
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

WORK ORDER 126643 B539 EXPAND IC SUITE75N91019D00024 · NIAID · LEIDOS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH, INC. · PI BRISCOE, LYNN · 2019 to 2025
$3932.6M
Validation, CLIA and Qualification (VQC): Enhancing the RS ratio as a tool for AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) tuberculosis trialsUM1AI106701 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI Grace M Aldrovandi · 2014 to 2026
$116.8M
Laboratory Center (LC): Microbicide Trials NetworkUM1AI106707 · NIAID · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI MELLORS, JOHN W, ROHAN, LISA CENCIA · 2014 to 2021
$27.1M
NCI NIH HHS 75N91019D00024NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106701NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI106707PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review current laboratory and clinical data on the frequency and relative risk of drug resistance and range of mutations selected from approved and investigational antiretroviral agents used for preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) of HIV-1 infection, including tenofovir disproxil fumarate (TDF)-based oral PrEP, dapivirine ring, injectable cabotegravir (CAB), islatravir, lenacapavir and broadly neutralizing antibodies (bNAbs). RECENT

findingsThe greatest risk of HIV-1 resistance from PrEP with oral TDF/emtricitabine (FTC) or injectable CAB is from starting or continuing PrEP after undiagnosed acute HIV infection. By contrast, the dapivirine intravaginal ring does not appear to select nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in clinical trial settings. Investigational inhibitors including islatravir, lenacapavir, and bNAbs are promising for use as PrEP due to their potential for sustained delivery and low risk of cross-resistance to currently used antiretrovirals, but surveillance for emergence of resistance mutations in more HIV-1 gene regions (gag, env) will be important as the same drugs are being developed for HIV therapy. SUMMARY: PrEP is highly effective in preventing HIV infection. Although HIV drug resistance from PrEP use could impact future options in individuals who seroconvert on PrEP, the current risk is low and continued monitoring for the emergence of resistance and cross-resistance during product development, clinical studies, and product roll-out is advised to preserve antiretroviral efficacy for both treatment and prevention.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV-1HIV InfectionsPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAnti-Retroviral AgentsBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesDrug ResistanceEmtricitabineHumansTenofovirAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Retroviral AgentsBroadly Neutralizing AntibodiesEmtricitabineTenofovir

Identifiers

PMID35762376
PMCPMC9245149
OpenAlexW4283650143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.