Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35762334›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2022

Prostatic artery occlusion versus prostatic artery embolisation for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia: early results in a canine model.

Vanesa Lucas-Cava, Francisco Miguel Sánchez-Margallo, Luis Dávila-Gómez, Juan Rafael Lima-Rodríguez, Fei Sun

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vanesa Lucas-CavaEndoluminal Therapy and Diagnosis Unit, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Francisco Miguel Sánchez-MargalloJesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Luis Dávila-GómezAnimal Housing Service, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Juan Rafael Lima-RodríguezAnaesthesiology Unit, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Fei SunEndoluminal Therapy and Diagnosis Unit, Jesús Usón Minimally Invasive Surgery Centre, Cáceres, Spain.
Centro de Cirugía de Mínima Invasión Jesús Usón · ESCentro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the technical efficacy and safety between prostatic artery occlusion (PAO) with ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) and prostatic artery embolizsation (PAE) with microspheres in a canine model.

methods17 adult male beagles underwent PAO (n = 7) with Onyx-18 or PAE (n = 10) with microspheres (300-500 µm). To evaluate the primary outcomes (technical efficacy and safety), MRI evaluations were performed immediately before and 1 week, 2 weeks, and 1 month after procedures to document prostate volume (PV); and all dogs were inspected for procedure-related complications during 1 month follow-up. The secondary outcomes included the prostate ischaemia size detected by MRI and recanalisation of prostatic artery by follow-up angiography. Differences between groups were statistically analysed.

resultsBoth procedures were bilaterally successful in all animals. Compared with PAE, the mean fluoroscopy time (23.80 vs 36.24 min, p = 0.014) and radiation dose (68.19 vs 125.26 mGy, p = 0.003) were significantly less in PAO procedure. The mean percentage of PV change significantly decreased in both groups at 2 weeks (30.71% vs  37.89%) and 1 month (56.41% %vs 55.56%) after PAO and PAE respectively), without significant differences between groups at either time point. No major complications were observed except one animal after PAO with transient haematuria and acute urinary retention. The mean prostate ischaemia induced by PAO was significant greater compared with PAE at 1 week (43.44% vs 18.91%, p=0.001). PAO with EVOH is technically feasible and with comparable efficacy and safety with PAE. There are possible benefits to PAO over PAE. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A new technical modification of the PAE consisting of the use of liquid embolic agent to occlude the prostatic artery trunk and its branches has been developed in pre-clinical study, showing to be an effective and safe procedure which can induce a significant prostate shrinkage for the management of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients. In addition, the findings have showed a similar therapeutic effect comparable with the conventional PAE using microspheres.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticLower Urinary Tract SymptomsProstatic HyperplasiaAnimalsArteriesDogsHumansIschemiaMaleProstateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID35762334
PMCPMC10162044
OpenAlexW4283640457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.