ArticleThe American journal on addictions2022
Barriers for recruitment to treatment of youths with co-occurring substance use disorders and depression.
Article in The American journal on addictions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesRecruitment challenges for treatment trials of adolescents with substance use disorder (SUD) and co-occurring depression (COD) have not been reported. The objective is to examine whether recruitment and engagement during the pretreatment assessment phase differ between adolescents in a SUD-COD versus SUD-only treatment study.
methodsA similar recruitment approach compared five-stage progressions in the pretreatment phase between a SUD-only (n = 252) and SUD-COD (n = 212) study. We examined the "gradient" of recruitment and retention along four stages after referral/inquiries; (a) screening for eligibility by phone, (b) meeting eligibility in an interview, (c) completion of baseline assessment, and (d) participation in the first psychotherapy session of each study.
resultsCompared to SUD-only, the retention of adolescents with SUD-COD was significantly poorer from referral/inquiry to all subsequent stages. In particular, the odds ratio and 95% confidence interval from referral/inquiry to screening for eligibility by phone, meeting eligibility in an interview, completion of baseline assessment, and participation in the first psychotherapy session were all less than one. Male attrition rates were slightly higher than females but were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsA high proportion of referred adolescents did not meet the study criteria. This indicates a need to examine (1) potential strategies for overcoming recruitment challenges in adolescents and their engagement in the pretreatment phase for studies of COD and (2) baseline variables for predictors and moderators for adequately powered studies. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first study to assess recruitment challenges for adolescents with COD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.