Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35762102›Full record

ArticleChemSusChem2022

Electrochemically Triggered Energy Release from an Azothiophene-Based Molecular Solar Thermal System.

Evanie Franz, Anne Kunz, Nils Oberhof, Andreas H Heindl, Manon Bertram, Lukas Fusek, Nicola Taccardi, Peter Wasserscheid, Andreas Dreuw, Hermann A Wegner and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ChemSusChem, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Amino-Substituted Azoxybenzenes as Potential Redox-Active Catholyte Materials.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Evanie FranzInterface Research and Catalysis, Erlangen Center for Interface Research and Catalysis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2070-0050
Anne KunzInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Nils OberhofInterdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 205 A, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas H HeindlInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, 35392, Giessen, Germany.
Manon BertramInterface Research and Catalysis, Erlangen Center for Interface Research and Catalysis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Lukas FusekInterface Research and Catalysis, Erlangen Center for Interface Research and Catalysis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Nicola TaccardiInstitute of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 3, D-91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Peter WasserscheidInstitute of Chemical Reaction Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 3, D-91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas DreuwInterdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, Universität Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 205 A, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hermann A WegnerInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Justus-Liebig-Universität, Heinrich-Buff-Ring 17, 35392, Giessen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7260-6018
Olaf BrummelInterface Research and Catalysis, Erlangen Center for Interface Research and Catalysis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5968-0774
Jörg LibudaInterface Research and Catalysis, Erlangen Center for Interface Research and Catalysis, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Egerlandstraße 3, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 315647310Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) 392607742DFG (Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1452 - Catalysis at Liquid Interfaces, Research Unit FOR 1878 "Functional Molecular Structures on Complex Oxide Surfaces" 214951840DFG (Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1452 - Catalysis at Liquid Interfaces, Research Unit FOR 1878 "Functional Molecular Structures on Complex Oxide Surfaces" 322419553DFG (Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1452 - Catalysis at Liquid Interfaces, Research Unit FOR 1878 "Functional Molecular Structures on Complex Oxide Surfaces" 397692616DFG (Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1452 - Catalysis at Liquid Interfaces, Research Unit FOR 1878 "Functional Molecular Structures on Complex Oxide Surfaces" 431733372DFG (Collaborative Research Centre SFB 1452 - Catalysis at Liquid Interfaces, Research Unit FOR 1878 "Functional Molecular Structures on Complex Oxide Surfaces" 453560721German Federal ministry of Education and Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular solar thermal (MOST) systems combine solar energy conversion, storage, and release in simple one-photon one-molecule processes. Here, we address the electrochemically triggered energy release from an azothiophene-based MOST system by photoelectrochemical infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (PEC-IRRAS) and density functional theory (DFT). Specifically, the electrochemically triggered back-reaction from the energy rich (Z)-3-cyanophenylazothiophene to its energy lean (E)-isomer using highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) as the working electrode was studied. Theory predicts that two reaction channels are accessible, an oxidative one (hole-catalyzed) and a reductive one (electron-catalyzed). Experimentally it was found that the photo-isomer decomposes during hole-catalyzed energy release. Electrochemically triggered back-conversion was possible, however, through the electron-catalyzed reaction channel. The reaction rate could be tuned by the electrode potential within two orders of magnitude. It was shown that the MOST system withstands 100 conversion cycles without detectable decomposition of the photoswitch. After 100 cycles, the photochemical conversion was still quantitative and the electrochemically triggered back-reaction reached 94 % of the original conversion level.

Indexed as

ElectrochemistryEnergy StoragePhotochemistryPhotoswitchesSolar Thermal Fuels

Identifiers

PMID35762102
PMCPMC9796447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.