Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35762085›Full record

ArticleJournal of sleep research2022

Optimising sounds for the driving of sleep oscillations by closed-loop auditory stimulation.

Eden Debellemanière, Clémence Pinaud, Jules Schneider, Pierrick J Arnal, Alexander J Casson, Mounir Chennaoui, Mathieu Galtier, Miguel Navarrete, Penelope A Lewis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of sleep research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Neurophysiological effects of targeting sleep spindles with closed-loop auditory stimulation.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  3. A Miniature Wireless Device for Closed-Loop Auditory Sleep Modulation.International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering : [proceedings]. International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Eden DebellemanièreUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de recherche biomédicale des armées (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, France.
Clémence PinaudResearch Team, Dreem, Paris, France.
Jules SchneiderSchool of Biological Sciences, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1986-3263
Pierrick J ArnalResearch Team, Dreem, New York, USA.
Alexander J CassonSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, the University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mounir ChennaouiUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de recherche biomédicale des armées (IRBA), Brétigny sur Orge, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4409-813X
Mathieu GaltierResearch Team, Dreem, Paris, France.
Miguel NavarreteSchool of Biomedical Engineering, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-4903-2156
Penelope A LewisCUBRIC, Psychology Department, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Université Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Manchester · GBCardiff University · GBHoly Redeemer · USUniversidad de Los Andes · CO

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J014478/1European Research Council SolutionSleep 681607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that slow oscillations (SOs) can be driven by rhythmic auditory stimulation, which deepens slow-wave sleep (SWS) and improves memory and the immune-supportive hormonal milieu related to this sleep stage. While different attempts have been made to optimise the driving of the SOs by changing the number of click stimulations, no study has yet investigated the impact of applying more than five clicks in a row. Likewise, the importance of the type of sounds in eliciting brain responses is presently unclear. In a study of 12 healthy young participants (10 females; aged 18-26 years), we applied an established closed-loop stimulation method, which delivered sequences of 10 pink noises, 10 pure sounds (B note of 247 Hz), 10 pronounced "a" vowels, 10 sham, 10 variable sounds, and 10 "oddball" sounds on the up phase of the endogenous SOs. By analysing area under the curve, amplitude, and event related potentials, we explored whether the nature of the sound had a differential effect on driving SOs. We showed that every stimulus in a 10-click sequence, induces a SO response. Interestingly, all three types of sounds that we tested triggered SOs. However, pink noise elicited a more pronounced response compared to the other sounds, which was explained by a broader topographical recruitment of brain areas. Our data further suggest that varying the sounds may partially counteract habituation.

Indexed as

ElectroencephalographySleep, Slow-WaveAcoustic StimulationFemaleHumansSleepSoundclosed-loop auditory stimulationsleepslow oscillationsslow-wave sleep

Identifiers

PMID35762085
PMCPMC9788124
OpenAlexW4283660778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.