SynthesisBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2022
Rapid review and meta-analysis of adverse events associated with molnupiravir in patients with COVID-19.
Synthesis in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Safety of RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase Inhibitors, Molnupiravir and VV116, for Oral Treatment of COVID-19: A Meta-Analysis.Iranian journal of medical sciences · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of effectiveness and safety of molnupiravir versus sotrovimab for COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and Safety of Molnupiravir Treatment for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.International journal of antimicrobial agents · 2023Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (Paxlovid) for COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis.Journal of medical virology · 2023Pooled it
- Rapid review and meta-analysis of adverse events associated with molnupiravir in patients with COVID-19.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Molnupiravir Use Among Patients with COVID-19 in Real-World Settings: A Systematic Literature Review.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2024Review
- Exploring Paxlovid Efficacy in COVID-19 Patients with MAFLD: Insights from a Single-Center Prospective Cohort Study.Viruses · 2024Article
- Molnupiravir: A Versatile Prodrug against SARS-CoV-2 Variants.Metabolites · 2023Review
- Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Molnupiravir for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate COVID-19 in Adult Patients during the Dominance of the Omicron Variant: A Meta-Analysis.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThe aim of this study was to evaluate the safety profile of molnupiravir in COVID-19 patients.
methodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, medRxive and Google Scholar were searched for articles published up to April 25, 2022. Meta-analysis was performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software.
resultsFour trials involving 2241 patients met the inclusion criteria. No significant difference was observed between molnupiravir at 200, 400 and 800 mg compared with placebo (200 mg: risk ratio [RR] = 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-1.20; P = .80; 400 mg: RR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.64-1.02; P = .07; 800 mg: RR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.83-1.06; P = .36) for any adverse events (AEs); at 200, 400 and 800 mg compared with placebo (200 mg: RR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.41-1.63; P = .57; 400 mg: RR = 0.82; 95% CI: 0.41-1.61; P = .56; 800 mg: RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.59-1.08; P = .15) for serious adverse events; at 200, 400 and 800 mg compared with placebo (200 mg: RR = 1.74; 95% CI: 0.48-6.30; P = .39; 400 mg: RR = 1.07; 95% CI: 0.28-4.09; P = .91; 800 mg: RR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.17-1.28; P = .14) for AEs leading to death; and at 200, 400 and 800 mg compared with placebo (200 mg: RR = 1.50; 95% CI: 0.26-8.55; P = .64; 400 mg: RR = 0.99; 95% CI: 0.17-5.68; P = .99; 800 mg: RR = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.31-1.23; P = .17) for treatment discontinuation due to AEs.
conclusionThis meta-analysis showed that the use of three doses of molnupiravir (200, 400 and 800 mg) is safe for COVID-19 patients. Further research is needed to confirm the present findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.