ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Effects of Bilateral Medial Rectus Resection on Motor Outcomes in Infantile Exotropia.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the effects of bilateral medial rectus resection (BMRres) on motor outcomes in infantile exotropia. Methods: We evaluated 19 cases of infantile exotropia surgery. The mean age at surgical alignment was 4.8±3.4 years (range, 1.5-11.8 years). The surgical procedures included BMRres (5 cases), BMRres with unilateral lateral rectus recession (ULRR) (3 cases), bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLRR) (8 cases), unilateral lateral rectus recession and medial rectus resection (uniRandR) with contralateral lateral rectus recession (2 cases), and uniRandR (1 case). After dividing the cases into two groups (BMRres group, n=8; other group, n=11), the outcomes at 1 day and at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery were compared. Surgical outcomes were defined as (1) success: distant esotropia ≤5 prism diopters ( Results: Although postoperative distant deviations at 1 day were not different between the two groups, the BMRres group showed smaller distant deviations at 1, 3, and 6 months than the other group (p=0.015, 0.019, and 0.006, respectively). Success rates of the BMRres and other groups were 88% and 73% at 1 day, 100% and 36% at 1 month, 88% and 27% at 3 months, 88% and 18% at 6 months, respectively. Although there were no significant differences between the two groups within 3 months after surgery, surgical outcomes in the BMRres group 6 months after surgery were significantly better than those in the other group (p=0.003). Conclusion: BMRres is a better procedure than others for infantile exotropia to achieve desirable motor outcomes after surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.