Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761943›Full record

ArticleOncology letters2022

An evaluation of lymphovascular invasion in relation to biology and prognosis according to subtypes in invasive breast cancer.

Reiki Nishimura, Tomofumi Osako, Yasuhiro Okumura, Masahiro Nakano, Hiroko Ohtsuka, Mamiko Fujisue, Nobuyuki Arima

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncology letters, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Genomic spectra of lymphovascular invasion in breast cancer.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Reiki NishimuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Tomofumi OsakoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Yasuhiro OkumuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Masahiro NakanoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Hiroko OhtsukaDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Mamiko FujisueDepartment of Breast Oncology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.
Nobuyuki ArimaDepartment of Pathology, Kumamoto Shinto General Hospital, Kumamoto, Kumamoto 862-8655, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is associated with a poor outcome in breast cancer. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical significance of LVI in primary breast cancer and to investigate disease-free survival as a prognostic marker according to the breast cancer subtypes. This study examined 4,652 consecutive cases of invasive breast cancer excluding the patients with non-invasive cancer, stage IV and those who underwent neo-adjuvant therapy from February 2002 to February 2021. The clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of LVI-positive and -negative tumors were compared. LVI was evaluated in H&E staining specimens from surgically resected samples. The LVI expression rates were 29.2% (low, 19.7%; high, 9.5%) in all primary cases. The LVI-positive rate was significantly associated with specimens with the following characteristics: ER/PgR-negative, HER2-positive, p53 overexpression, higher Ki-67 index values, higher nuclear grade, positive nodes and larger tumors. Moreover, the subtypes were significantly associated with LVI positivity; 20% in Luminal A, 34.6% in Luminal B, 40.9% in Lumina/HER2, 38.1% in HER2-enriched and 29.8% in triple negative (TN). There were significant differences in disease-free survival between LVI status in Luminal A, Luminal B and TN subtypes, but there was no difference in the Luminal/HER2 and HER2-enriched subtypes. A multivariate analysis revealed that LVI was a significant factor in Luminal B and TN subtypes. Overall, LVI was significantly associated with the advanced and aggressive characteristics in breast cancer. Luminal A type had a lower LVI rate, and HER2 type had a higher LVI rate. Moreover, LVI was a significant prognostic factor in Luminal B and TN subtypes. These data suggested that the LVI status was useful in predicting the prognosis in HER2 negative breast cancer cases.

Indexed as

breast cancerdisease-free survivalestrogen receptorKi-67lymphovascular invasionprogesterone receptorreceptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2subtype

Identifiers

PMID35761943
PMCPMC9214702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.