ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Efficacy of Digestive Endoscope Based on Artificial Intelligence System in Diagnosing Early Esophageal Carcinoma.
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Opportunities and challenges of artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopy and high-quality data for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2026Review
- AI-driven pathology in esophageal cancer: from early screening to precision prognostics.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Efficiency of endoscopic artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of early esophageal cancer.Thoracic cancer · 2024Article
- Application of convolutional neural network-based endoscopic imaging in esophageal cancer or high-grade dysplasia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2023Article
- The current state of artificial intelligence in endoscopic diagnosis of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the efficacy of digestive endoscopy (DEN) based on artificial intelligence (AI) system in diagnosing early esophageal carcinoma. Methods: The clinical data of 300 patients with suspected esophageal carcinoma treated in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed; among them, 198 were diagnosed with esophageal carcinoma after pathological examination, and 102 had benign esophageal lesion. An AI system based on convolutional neural network (CNN) was adopted to assess the DEN images of patients with early esophageal carcinoma. A total of 200 patients (148 with early esophageal carcinoma and 52 with benign esophageal lesion) were selected as the learning group for the Inception V3 image classification system to learn; and the rest 100 patients (50 with early esophageal carcinoma and 50 with benign esophageal lesion) were included in the diagnosis group for the Inception V3 system to assist the narrow-band imaging (NBI) with diagnosis. The diagnosis results from Inception V3-assisted NBI were compared with those from imaging physicians, and the diagnostic efficacy diagram was drawn. Results: The diagnosis rate of AI-NBI was significantly faster than that of physician diagnosis (0.02 ± 0.01 vs. 5.65 ± 0.32 s (mean rate of two physicians), Conclusion: CNN-based AI system can assist NBI in screening early esophageal carcinoma, which has a good application prospect in the clinical diagnosis of early esophageal carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.