Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761418›Full record

ArticleGenome medicine2022

Penetrance estimation of Alzheimer disease in SORL1 loss-of-function variant carriers using a family-based strategy and stratification by APOE genotypes.

Catherine Schramm, Camille Charbonnier, Aline Zaréa, Morgane Lacour, David Wallon, CNRMAJ collaborators, Anne Boland, Jean-François Deleuze, Robert Olaso, ADES consortium and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Familial Alzheimer's disease mutation identifies novel role of SORLA in release of neurotrophic exosomes.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
  9. International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. TheProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine SchrammNormandie Université, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and CNRMAJ, FHU-G4 Génomique, 22 boulevard Gambetta - CS 76183, Rouen, F-76000, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1185-8809
Camille CharbonnierNormandie Université, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and CNRMAJ, FHU-G4 Génomique, 22 boulevard Gambetta - CS 76183, Rouen, F-76000, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1172-0196
Aline ZaréaNormandie Université, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Neurology and CNRMAJ, FHU-G4 Génomique, Rouen, F-76000, France.
Morgane LacourNormandie Université, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Neurology and CNRMAJ, FHU-G4 Génomique, Rouen, F-76000, France.
David WallonNormandie Université, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Neurology and CNRMAJ, FHU-G4 Génomique, Rouen, F-76000, France.
CNRMAJ collaborators
Anne BolandUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, 91057, Evry, France.
Jean-François DeleuzeUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, 91057, Evry, France.
Robert OlasoUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, Centre National de Recherche en Génomique Humaine, 91057, Evry, France.
ADES consortium
Flora AlarconMAP5, UMR-CNRS 8145, Paris University, 75270, Paris, France.
Dominique CampionNormandie Université, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and CNRMAJ, FHU-G4 Génomique, 22 boulevard Gambetta - CS 76183, Rouen, F-76000, France.
Grégory NuelLPSM, CNRS 8001, Sorbonne University, 75005, Paris, France.
Gaël NicolasNormandie Université, UNIROUEN, Inserm U1245, CHU Rouen, Department of Genetics and CNRMAJ, FHU-G4 Génomique, 22 boulevard Gambetta - CS 76183, Rouen, F-76000, France. gaelnicolas@hotmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-7800
Inserm · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCentre Hospitalier du Rouvray · FR

Funding

THE NIA GENETICS OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE DATA STORAGE SITEU24AG041689 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI-SAN WANG · 2012 to 2026
$42.3M
NIA NIH HHS U24 AG041689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlzheimer disease (AD) is a common complex disorder with a high genetic component. Loss-of-function (LoF) SORL1 variants are one of the strongest AD genetic risk factors. Estimating their age-related penetrance is essential before putative use for genetic counseling or preventive trials. However, relative rarity and co-occurrence with the main AD risk factor, APOE-ε4, make such estimations difficult.

methodsWe proposed to estimate the age-related penetrance of SORL1-LoF variants through a survival framework by estimating the conditional instantaneous risk combining (i) a baseline for non-carriers of SORL1-LoF variants, stratified by APOE-ε4, derived from the Rotterdam study (N = 12,255), and (ii) an age-dependent proportional hazard effect for SORL1-LoF variants estimated from 27 extended pedigrees (including 307 relatives ≥ 40 years old, 45 of them having genotyping information) recruited from the French reference center for young Alzheimer patients. We embedded this model into an expectation-maximization algorithm to accommodate for missing genotypes. To correct for ascertainment bias, proband phenotypes were omitted. Then, we assessed if our penetrance curves were concordant with age distributions of APOE-ε4-stratified SORL1-LoF variant carriers detected among sequencing data of 13,007 cases and 10,182 controls from European and American case-control study consortia.

resultsSORL1-LoF variants penetrance curves reached 100% (95% confidence interval [99-100%]) by age 70 among APOE-ε4ε4 carriers only, compared with 56% [40-72%] and 37% [26-51%] in ε4 heterozygous carriers and ε4 non-carriers, respectively. These estimates were fully consistent with observed age distributions of SORL1-LoF variant carriers in case-control study data.

conclusionsWe conclude that SORL1-LoF variants should be interpreted in light of APOE genotypes for future clinical applications.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseLDL-Receptor Related ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsApolipoproteins ECase-Control StudiesGenotypeHumansPenetranceApoE protein, humanApolipoproteins ELDL-Receptor Related ProteinsMembrane Transport ProteinsSORL1 protein, humanAlzheimerAPOEExpectation-maximization algorithmLifetime riskMissing genotypesPedigreePenetranceSORL1

Identifiers

PMID35761418
PMCPMC9238165
OpenAlexW4283705507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.