Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761351›Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2022

Consideration of sex and gender differences in addiction medication response.

Sherry A McKee, Aimee L McRae-Clark

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Women and alcohol: A call to action.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sherry A McKeeYale School of Medicine, 2 Church St South, Suite 109, New Haven, CT, 06519, USA. sherry.mckee@yale.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-8185-9201
Aimee L McRae-ClarkMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, USA.
Medical University of South Carolina · USYale University · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
The Impact of Stress and Craving on Return to Postpartum Cannabis UseU54DA016511 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI CONSTANCE GUILLE · 2018 to 2026
$15.9M
Yale-SCORE Resource Support CoreU54AA027989 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI Marina R Picciotto · 2020 to 2026
$13.0M
MID-CAREER AWARD IN PATIENT-ORIENTED DRUG ABUSE RESEARCHK24DA038240 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCRAE-CLARK, AIMEE L · 2014 to 2023
$1.9M
Sex-Appropriate Treatment Development for Alcohol Use DisordersP01AA027473 · NIAAA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCKEE, SHERRY ANN · 2018 to 2019
$1.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAAA NIH HHS U54 AA027989NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA038240NIH HHS P01AA027473NIH HHS U54AA027989NIH HHS U54DA016511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use continues to contribute to significant morbidity and mortality in the United States, for both women and men, more so than another other preventable health condition. To reduce the public health burden attributable to substances, the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism have identified that medication development for substance use disorder is a high priority research area. Furthermore, both Institutes have stated that research on sex and gender differences in substance use medication development is a critical area. The purpose of the current narrative review is to highlight how sex and gender have been considered (or not) in medication trials for substance use disorders to clarify and summarize what is known regarding sex and gender differences in efficacy and to provide direction to the field to advance medication development that is consistent with current NIH 'sex as a biological variable' (SABV) policy. To that end, we reviewed major classes of abused substances (nicotine, alcohol, cocaine, cannabis, opioids) demonstrating that, sex and gender have not been well-considered in addiction medication development research. However, when adequate data on sex and gender differences have been evaluated (i.e., in tobacco cessation), clinically significant differences in response have been identified between women and men. Across the other drugs of abuse reviewed, data also suggest sex and gender may be predictive of outcome for some agents, although the relatively low representation of women in clinical research samples limits making definitive conclusions. We recommend the incorporation of sex and gender into clinical care guidelines and improved access to publicly available sex-stratified data from medication development investigations.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersFemaleHumansMaleNicotineSex FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesNicotineAddictionAlcoholCannabisGenderMedication developmentNicotineOpioidsSexSubstance

Identifiers

PMID35761351
PMCPMC9235243
OpenAlexW4283701140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.