Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761343›Full record

ArticleTrials2022

A multicomponent family support intervention in intensive care units: study protocol for a multicenter cluster-randomized trial (FICUS Trial).

Rahel Naef, Miodrag Filipovic, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Stefanie von Felten, Judith Safford, Marco Riguzzi, Michael Rufer

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05280691 (A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05280691 nacompletednot on this map

A Multi-center, Cluster Randomized Superiority Trial of a Guideline-based Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units

TypeinterventionalSponsorRahel NaefRan2022 to 2025Enrolled885ConditionsPostintensive Care Syndrome, Family Members, Quality of Life, Depression, AnxietyArmsFamily Support Intervention (FSI)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Post-ICU Care: Why, What, When and How? ISCCM Position Statement.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rahel NaefInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland. rahel.naef@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5872-076X
Miodrag FilipovicSurgical Intensive Care Unit, Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Rescue and Pain Medicine, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Rorschacher Strasse 95, 9007, St. Gallen, Switzerland.
Marie-Madlen JeitzinerDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital, University of Bern, Freiburgstrasse 16, CH10, Bern, Switzerland.
Stefanie von FeltenDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Prevention Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Hirschengraben 84, 8001, Zurich, Switzerland.
Judith Safford, Bern, Switzerland.
Marco RiguzziInstitute for Implementation Science in Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Universitätsstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael RuferDepartment of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
University of Zurich · CHUniversity of Bern · CHUniversity of St.Gallen · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 33IC30_198778 / 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily members of critically ill patients face considerable uncertainty and distress during their close others' intensive care unit (ICU) stay. About 20-60% of family members experience adverse mental health outcomes post-ICU, such as symptoms of anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress. Guidelines recommend structured family inclusion, communication, and support, but the existing evidence base around protocolized family support interventions is modest and requires substantiation.

methodsTo test the clinical effectiveness and explore the implementation of a multicomponent, nurse-led family support intervention in ICUs, we will undertake a parallel, cluster-randomized, controlled, multicenter superiority hybrid-type 1 trial. It will include eight clusters (ICUs) per study arm, with a projected total sample size of 896 family members of adult, critically ill patients treated in the German-speaking part of Switzerland. The trial targets family members of critically ill patients with an expected ICU stay of 48 h or longer. Families in the intervention arm will receive a family support intervention in addition to usual care. The intervention consists of specialist nurse support that is mapped to the patient pathway with follow-up care and includes psycho-educational and relationship-focused family interventions, and structured, interprofessional communication, and shared decision-making with families. Families in the control arm will receive usual care. The primary study endpoint is quality of family care, operationalized as family members' satisfaction with ICU care at discharge. Secondary endpoints include quality of communication and nurse support, family management of critical illness (functioning, resilience), and family members' mental health (well-being, psychological distress) measured at admission, discharge, and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Data of all participants, regardless of protocol adherence, will be analyzed using linear mixed-effects models, with the individual participant as the unit of inference. DISCUSSION: This trial will examine the effectiveness of the family support intervention and generate knowledge of its implementability. Both types of evidence are necessary to determine whether the intervention works as intended in clinical practice and could be scaled up to other ICUs. The study findings will make a significant contribution to the current body of knowledge on effective ICU care that promotes family participation and well-being.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05280691 . Prospectively registered on 20 February 2022.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessFicusAdultAnxietyEquivalence Trials as TopicFamilyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnxiety (MeSH)Cluster-randomized controlled trial (non-MeSH)Depression (MeSH)Family (MeSH)Family nursing (MeSH)Intensive care (MeSH)Postintensive care syndrome – family (non-MeSH)Post-traumatic stress disorder (MeSH)Satisfaction with care (non-MeSH)

Identifiers

PMID35761343
PMCPMC9235279
OpenAlexW4283593468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.