Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761328›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Endometrial ablation plus levonorgestrel releasing intrauterine system versus endometrial ablation alone in women with heavy menstrual bleeding: study protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial; MIRA2 trial.

Tamara J Oderkerk, Pleun Beelen, Peggy M A J Geomini, Malou C Herman, Jaklien C Leemans, Ruben G Duijnhoven, Judith E Bosmans, Justine N Pannekoek, Thomas J Clark, Ben Willem J Mol and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Heavy Menstrual Bleeding: Experiences and Learnings From Patient Survey.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Outcome reporting for heavy menstrual bleeding.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Tamara J OderkerkDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Postbox 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands. tamara.oderkerk@mmc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2307-0338
Pleun BeelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Postbox 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Peggy M A J GeominiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Postbox 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Malou C HermanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.
Jaklien C LeemansDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Postbox 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Ruben G DuijnhovenClinical Trials Unit of the Netherlands Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Judith E BosmansDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Justine N PannekoekClinical Trials Unit of the Netherlands Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Thomas J ClarkUniversity Department of Medicine and Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Ben Willem J MolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash Medical Centre Clayton, Melbourne, Australia.
Marlies Y BongersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Máxima Medical Centre, Postbox 7777, 5500 MB, Veldhoven, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLBirmingham Women's Hospital · GBJeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis · NLMonash Medical Centre · AUVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is estimated that between 12 to 25% of women who undergo an endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) are dissatisfied after two years because of recurrent menstrual bleeding and/or cyclical pelvic pain, with around 15% of these women ultimately having a hysterectomy. The insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) immediately after endometrial ablation may inactivate residual untreated endometrium and/or inhibit the regeneration of endometrial tissue. Furthermore, the LNG-IUS may prevent agglutination of the uterine walls preventing intrauterine adhesion formation associated with endometrial ablation. In these ways, insertion of an LNG-IUS immediately after endometrial ablation might prevent subsequent hysterectomies because of persisting uterine bleeding and cyclical pelvic pain or pain that arises de novo. Hence, we evaluate if the combination of endometrial ablation and an LNG-IUS is superior to endometrial ablation alone in terms of reducing subsequent rates of hysterectomy at two years following the initial ablative procedure. METHODS/

designWe perform a multicentre randomised controlled trial in 35 hospitals in the Netherlands. Women with heavy menstrual bleeding, who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation and without contraindication for an LNG-IUS are eligible. After informed consent, participants are randomly allocated to either endometrial ablation plus LNG-IUS or endometrial ablation alone. The primary outcome is the hysterectomy rate at 24 months following endometrial ablation. Secondary outcomes include women's satisfaction, reinterventions, complications, side effects, menstrual bleeding patterns, quality of life, societal costs. DISCUSSION: The results of this study will help clinicians inform women with HMB who opt for treatment with endometrial ablation about whether concomitant use of the LNG-IUS is beneficial for reducing the need for hysterectomy due to ongoing bleeding and/or pain symptoms. Trial registration Dutch Trial registration: NL7817. Registered 20 June 2019, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7817 .

Indexed as

Contraceptive Agents, FemaleEndometrial Ablation TechniquesIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedMenorrhagiaFemaleHumansLevonorgestrelMulticenter Studies as TopicPelvic PainQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicContraceptive Agents, FemaleLevonorgestrelDysmenorrhoeaEndometrial ablationHeavy menstrual bleedingHysterectomyLevonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systemPelvic pain

Identifiers

PMID35761328
PMCPMC9235075
OpenAlexW4283583635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.