Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761273›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2022

Stakeholder perceptions on the deployment of multiple first-line therapies for uncomplicated malaria: a qualitative study in the health district of Kaya, Burkina Faso.

Denise Hien, Jean Moise Tanga Kaboré, Mohamadou Siribié, Issiaka Soulama, Nouhoun Barry, Adama Baguiya, Alfred Bewendtaoré Tiono, André-Marie Tchouatieu, Sodiomon Bienvenu Sirima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Public Health Perspectives on IntegratingTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Breaking the cycle of malaria treatment failure.Frontiers in epidemiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Denise HienGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. d.hien@gras.bf.
Jean Moise Tanga KaboréGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Mohamadou SiribiéGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Issiaka SoulamaGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Nouhoun BarryGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Adama BaguiyaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé (IRSS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Alfred Bewendtaoré TionoGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
André-Marie TchouatieuMedicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), Geneva, Switzerland.
Sodiomon Bienvenu SirimaGroupe de Recherche Action en Santé (GRAS), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
Groupe de Recherche et d’Action sur le Foncier · BFInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFMedicines for Malaria Venture · CHSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Burkina Faso, malaria remains the first cause of medical consultation and hospitalization in health centres. First-line case management of malaria in the country's health facilities is based on the use of artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). To optimize the use of these anti-malarial drugs in the perspective of mitigating the emergence of artemisinin resistance, which is a serious threat to malaria control and elimination, a pilot programme using multiple first-line therapies (MFTs) [three artemisinin-based combinations-pyronaridine-artesunate, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine and artemether-lumefantrine] has been designed for implementation. As the success of this MFT pilot programme depends on the perceptions of key stakeholders in the health system and community members, the study aimed to assess their perceptions on the implementation of this strategy.

methodsSemi-structured interviews, including 27 individual in-depth interviews and 41 focus groups discussions, were conducted with key stakeholders including malaria control policymakers and implementers, health system managers, health workers and community members. Volunteers from targets stakeholder groups were randomly selected. All interviews were recorded, transcribed and translated. Content analysis was performed using the qualitative software programme QDA Miner.

resultsThe interviews revealed a positive perception of stakeholders on the implementation of the planned MFT programme. They saw the strategy as an opportunity to strengthen the supply of anti-malarial drugs and improve the management of fever and malaria. However, due to lack of experience with the products, health workers and care givers expressed some reservations about the effectiveness and side-effect profiles of the two anti-malarial drugs included as first-line therapy in the MFT programme (pyronaridine-artesunate, dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine). Questions were raised about the appropriateness of segmenting the population into three groups and assigning a specific drug to each group.

conclusionThe adherence of both populations and key stakeholders to the MFT implementation strategy will likely depend on the efficacy of the proposed drugs, the absence of, or low frequency of, side-effects, the cost of drugs and availability of the different combinations.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsArtemisininsMalariaMalaria, FalciparumAmodiaquineArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtesunateBurkina FasoDrug CombinationsDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansNaphthyridinesAmodiaquineAntimalarialsArtemetherArtemether, Lumefantrine Drug CombinationArtemisininsArtesunateDrug CombinationsNaphthyridinespyronaridine tetraphosphate, artesunate drug combinationBurkina FasoCommunityMalariaMFTPerceptionQualitative

Identifiers

PMID35761273
PMCPMC9235275
OpenAlexW4283589619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.