Trial reportBMC geriatrics2022
Equipment-free, unsupervised high intensity interval training elicits significant improvements in the physiological resilience of older adults.
Trial report in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03473990 (A Randomised Control Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Short-term, Home-based High- Intensity Interval Training), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Control Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Short-term, Home-based High- Intensity Interval Training (HIT) for Improving Indices of Cardiorespiratory Fitness
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The effect of pre-operative exercise training on post-operative cognitive function: a systematic review.European geriatric medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training on the Parameters Related to Physical Fitness and Health of Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Sports medicine - open · 2024Pooled it
- Solving the High-Intensity Multimodal Training Prescription Puzzle: A Systematic Mapping Review.Sports medicine - open · 2024Pooled it
- Supervised Versus Unsupervised Exercise for the Improvement of Physical Function and Well-Being Outcomes in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Pooled it
- Effects of High-Intensity Interval Training in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-Randomized Intervention Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of bodyweight interval training on frailty status in older adults: a randomized controlled trial.European geriatric medicine · 2026Article
- Influence of a sport-oriented exercise concept on motor performance and sustainability in healthy but sporting inactive older adults aged 60.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Uncovering intensity trajectory patterns and their association with blood pressure adaptation following school-based high-intensity interval exercise in adolescents: Wroclaw PEER-HEART study.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2026Article
- Enhancing active aging through exercise: a comparative study of high-intensity interval training and continuous aerobic training benefits.Frontiers in aging · 2025Review
- Review of Exercise Interventions to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Nondialysis CKD.Kidney international reports · 2024Review
- Home-based high-intensity interval training improves cardiorespiratory fitness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Body composition, cardiorespiratory fitness, and neuromuscular adaptations induced by a home-based whole-body high intensity interval training.Journal of exercise science and fitness · 2023Article
- Correction: Equipment-free, unsupervised high intensity interval training elicits significant improvements in the physiological resilience of older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundReduced cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is an independent risk factor for dependency, cognitive impairment and premature mortality. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a proven time-efficient stimulus for improving both CRF and other facets of cardiometabolic health also known to decline with advancing age. However, the efficacy of equipment-free, unsupervised HIIT to improve the physiological resilience of older adults is not known.
methodsThirty independent, community-dwelling older adults (71(SD: 5) years) were randomised to 4 weeks (12 sessions) equipment-free, supervised (in the laboratory (L-HIIT)) or unsupervised (at home (H-HIIT)) HIIT, or a no-intervention control (CON). HIIT involved 5, 1-minute intervals of a bodyweight exercise each interspersed with 90-seconds recovery. CRF, exercise tolerance, blood pressure (BP), body composition, muscle architecture, circulating lipids and glucose tolerance were assessed at baseline and after the intervention period.
resultsWhen compared to the control group, both HIIT protocols improved the primary outcome of CRF ((via anaerobic threshold) mean difference, L-HIIT: +2.27, H-HIIT: +2.29, both p < 0.01) in addition to exercise tolerance, systolic BP, total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol and m. vastus lateralis pennation angle, to the same extent. There was no improvement in these parameters in CON. There was no change in diastolic BP, glucose tolerance, whole-body composition or HDL cholesterol in any of the groups.
conclusionsThis is the first study to show that short-term, time-efficient, equipment-free, HIIT is able to elicit improvements in the CRF of older adults irrespective of supervision status. Unsupervised HIIT may offer a novel approach to improve the physiological resilience of older adults, combating age-associated physiological decline, the rise of inactivity and the additional challenges currently posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.
trial registrationThis study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov and coded: NCT03473990 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.