Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761254›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2022

Evidence for an expanded hypertension care cascade in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.

Michael A Peters, Caitlin M Noonan, Krishna D Rao, Anbrasi Edward, Olakunle O Alonge

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Hypertension awareness, treatment, control, and prognosis: insights from the sub-cohort of China PEACE million persons project.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. The state of hypertension in Africa: Insights into hypertension in Gambia.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael A PetersDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA. mpeters@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6423-758X
Caitlin M NoonanDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Krishna D RaoDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Anbrasi EdwardDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Olakunle O AlongeDepartment of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith nearly 90% of annual hypertension-related deaths occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), there is an urgent need to measure the coverage of health services that effectively manage hypertension. However, there is little agreement on how to define effective coverage and the existing hypertension care cascade (hypertension prevalence, percent aware, percent treated, and percent controlled) does not account for the quality of care received by patients. This study reviews definitions of effective coverage and service quality for hypertension management services and proposes an expanded hypertension care cascade to improve measurement of health systems performance.

methodsA systematic scoping review of literature published in six electronic databases between January 2000 and October 2020 identified studies that defined effective coverage of hypertension management services or integrated dimensions of service quality into population-based estimates of hypertension management in LMICs. Findings informed an expanded hypertension care cascade from which quality-adjusted service coverage can be calculated to approximate effective coverage.

resultsThe review identified 18 relevant studies, including 6 that defined effective coverage for hypertension management services and 12 that reported a measure of service quality in a population-based study. Based on commonly reported barriers to hypertension management, new steps on the proposed expanded care cascade include (i) population screened, (ii) population linked to quality care, and (iii) population adhering to prescribed treatment.

conclusionThere is little consensus on the definition of effective coverage of hypertension management services, and most studies do not describe the quality of hypertension management services provided to populations. Incorporating aspects of service quality to the hypertension care cascade allows for the calculation of quality-adjusted coverage of relevant services, enabling an appropriate measurement of health systems performance through effective coverage.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHypertensionDelivery of Health CareHealth ServicesHumansPovertyCare cascadeHypertensionHypertension managementScoping review

Identifiers

PMID35761254
PMCPMC9235242
OpenAlexW4283693679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.