Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761186›Full record

SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2022

Educational approaches for patients with heart surgery: a systematic review of main features and effects.

Leila Shahmoradi, Nafiseh Rezaei, Sorayya Rezayi, Mitra Zolfaghari, Babak Manafi

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Observational
  3. Patients' Experience With Enhanced Recovery After Cardiac Surgery.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Leila ShahmoradiHealth Information Management Department and Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Nafiseh RezaeiMedical Library and Information Science, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. n_rezaei@razi.tums.ac.ir.
Sorayya RezayiHealth Information Management Department and Medical Informatics, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. s_rezayi@razi.tums.ac.ir.
Mitra ZolfaghariDepartment of eLearning in Medical Education, Virtual School of Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Naderi Street, Keshavarz Blvd, Tehran, Iran.
Babak ManafiDepartment of Heart Surgery, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRHamedan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatients who undergo heart surgery are exposed to mental and physical difficulties after discharge from hospital. They often need support and follow-up after discharge. The use of educational approaches or solutions before or after heart surgery can increase patients' knowledge on the post-operative complications and self-care. The main purpose of this systematic review is to determine the applications of educational approaches and investigate the effects of these approaches on patients with heart surgery. METHOD AND MATERIEL: A thorough search was conducted in Medline (through PubMed), Scopus, ISI web of science to select related articles published between 2011 and May 2022. All of the retrieved papers were screened according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist.

resultsA total of 29 articles were obtained from the search, which included in this systematic review after being assessed based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Most of the articles (n = 10, 34.48%) had been conducted in Canada and Iran, with the most significant number published in 2016. Out of 29 studies, 23 were experimental studies, and six were observational-analytical studies. The number of participants in the studies ranged from 11 to 600 (IQR1: 57.5, median: 88, IQR3: 190). In 28 (96.55%) studies, the educational approaches had a significant effect on clinical, economic or patient-reported outcomes. The greatest effect reported by the studies was related to clinical outcomes such as patient care improvement or change in clinical practice. The most effects in the patient-reported outcomes were related to improving patient satisfaction and patient knowledge. In terms of global rating scores, 17.24% of the included studies were considered as weak, 20.68% as moderate, and 62.06% as strong.

conclusionThe results of systematic review showed that the use of educational approaches by patients before and after heart surgery can have significant effects on reducing stress and financial burden, and increasing the quality of care and level of knowledge in patients.

Indexed as

Cardiac Surgical ProceduresDelivery of Health CareChecklistHumansPatient DischargeSelf CareEducationEducational solutionsHeart surgeryPRISMATechnology

Identifiers

PMID35761186
PMCPMC9238074
OpenAlexW4283711288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.