Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761123›Full record

Trial reportClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2022

Randomized phase II trial of FOLFIRI-panitumumab compared with FOLFIRI alone in patients with RAS wild-type circulating tumor DNA metastatic colorectal cancer beyond progression to first-line FOLFOX-panitumumab: the BEYOND study (GEMCAD 17-01).

Jorge Aparicio, Anna C Virgili Manrique, Jaume Capdevila, Félix Muñoz Boza, Patricia Galván, Paula Richart, Helena Oliveres, David Páez, Jorge Hernando, Sara Serrano and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Jorge AparicioMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Avda. Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain. japariciou@seom.org.
Anna C Virgili ManriqueMedical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Jaume CapdevilaMedical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Félix Muñoz BozaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain.
Patricia GalvánTranslational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villaroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
Paula RichartMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Avda. Abril Martorell 106, 46026, Valencia, Spain.
Helena OliveresTranslational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villaroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
David PáezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Jorge HernandoMedical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Barcelona, Spain.
Sara SerranoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus, Reus, Spain.
Ruth VeraMedical Oncology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Xavier Hernandez-YagüeMedical Oncology Department, ICO, Girona, Girona, Spain.
Rafael Álvarez GallegoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Madrid Norte San Chinarro-Centro Integral Oncologico Clara Campal, Madrid, Spain.
M Carmen Riesco-MartinezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario, 12 Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Xavier García de AlbenizRTI Health Solutions, Barcelona, Spain.
Joan MaurelTranslational Genomics and Targeted Therapies in Solid Tumors, Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, C/ Villaroel, 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain. jmaurel@clinic.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9413-5592
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitari Sant Joan de Reus · ESBreast Cancer Research Foundation · USClínica Girona · ESComplejo Hospitalario de Navarra · ESHospital Quirón Teknon · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESVall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePanitumumab plus FOLFOX (P-FOLFOX) is standard first-line treatment for RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer. The value of panitumumab rechallenge is currently unknown. We assessed addition of panitumumab to FOLFIRI (P-FOLFIRI) beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in patients with no RAS mutations in liquid biopsy (LB).

methodsIn this randomized phase II trial, patients were assigned (3:2 ratio) to second-line P-FOLFIRI (arm A) or FOLFIRI alone (arm B). LB for circulating tumor DNA analysis was collected at study entry and at disease progression. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival. Two-stage Simon design required 85 patients to be included (EudraCT 2017-004519-38).

resultsBetween February 2019 and November 2020, 49 patients were screened (16 RAS mutations in LB detected) and 31 included (18 assigned to arm A and 13 to arm B). The study was prematurely closed due to inadequate recruitment. Serious adverse events were more frequent in arm A (44% vs. 23%). Overall response rate was 33% (arm A) vs. 7.7% (arm B). Six-month progression-free survival rate was 66.7% (arm A) and 38.5% (arm B). Median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (arm A) and 4.0 months (arm B) (hazard ratio, 0.58). At disease progression, RAS or BRAF mutations in LB were found in 4/11 patients (36%) in arm A and 2/10 (20%) in arm B.

conclusionsThe BEYOND study suggests a meaningful benefit of P-FOLFIRI beyond progression to P-FOLFOX in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with WT RAS status selected by LB. This strategy deserves further investigation.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAColonic NeoplasmsColorectal NeoplasmsRectal NeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCamptothecinDisease ProgressionFluorouracilHumansLeucovorinPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafAntibodies, MonoclonalCamptothecinCirculating Tumor DNAFluorouracilLeucovorinPanitumumabProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafColorectal cancerLiquid biopsyMetastatic diseasePanitumumabSecond line therapy

Identifiers

PMID35761123
PMCPMC9522782
OpenAlexW4283711296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.