Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35761033›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2022

The Nature and Evolution of the Mentoring Relationship in Academic Health Centers.

Sarah E M Hill, Wendy L Ward, A Seay, J Buzenski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Navigating Challenges for Psychologist Leaders in Academic Health Centers.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The Importance of Mentorship in Career Development.The American journal of pathology · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Medical science educator · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Development and Implementation of a Structured and Innovative Faculty-Wide Mentorship Program for a Large Department of Psychiatry.Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah E M HillUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Wendy L WardDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, AR, USA. wward@uams.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6009-7762
A SeayDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Little Rock, AR, USA.
J BuzenskiDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mentoring has a long tradition in academic health centers, and from an institutional perspective can positively impact retention, wellness, promotion success, work satisfaction, and more. On the individual level, mentorship can provide professional growth and personal satisfaction for both participants. However, mentors may struggle with how to build their mentorship skills, navigating challenges with mentees over time, or if/how/when to conclude a mentor-mentee relationship. Mentees may not understand how to find a mentor, what the nature of that relationship is, or what their role is (what characterizes a "good" mentee). As important as mentorship is, it can be challenging for both to find and maintain a high-quality mentor-mentee relationship. This article reviews the qualities that are most critical in developing a successful mentoring relationship, the longitudinal nature of this relationship, common problems that arise, and the potential rewards that exist for each person involved in the relationship.

Indexed as

MentoringHumansMentorsPersonal SatisfactionProgram EvaluationMenteeMentorMentoring

Identifiers

PMID35761033
PMCPMC9243938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.