Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35760999›Full record

ArticleAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2022

Liquid Biopsies: Flowing Biomarkers.

Vincent Hyenne, Jacky G Goetz, Naël Osmani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent HyenneINSERM UMR_S1109, Strasbourg, France.
Jacky G GoetzINSERM UMR_S1109, Strasbourg, France.
Naël OsmaniINSERM UMR_S1109, Strasbourg, France. osmani@unistra.fr.
Université de Strasbourg · FRLa Ligue Contre le Cancer · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastatic dissemination accounts for most of the death in patients during cancer progression. There is thus an urge to identify specific biomarkers as proxies for cancer progression and assessment of treatment efficiency. Cancer is a systemic disease involving the shuttling of tumor cells and tumor secreted factors to distant organs, mostly via biofluids. During this transfer, these factors are accessible for easy sampling and therefore constitute a unique source of information witnessing the presence and the evolution of the disease. Hence, liquid biopsies offer multiple advantages, including simple and low-invasive sampling procedures, low cost, and higher compliance. Importantly, liquid biopsies are adapted to personalized medicine allowing a longitudinal follow-up to monitor treatment efficiency or resistance, and risk of relapse.The evolution of methodologies to isolate circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and extracellular vesicles (EVs) from blood samples associated with the characterization of their membrane surface repertoire and content have been instrumental in the emergence of liquid biopsies as an easy and non-invasive alternative as opposed to classical surgery-mediated tumor biopsies.In this chapter, we comment on CTCs and EVs carrying features with great potential as cancer biomarkers. More specifically, we focus on the adhesive and mechanical properties of CTCs as metastatic markers. We also consider the recent development of EVs isolation methods and the identification of new biomarkers. Finally, we discuss their relevance as cancer prognosis tools.

Indexed as

Extracellular VesiclesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingBiomarkers, TumorHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerCTC (circulating tumor cell)Extracellular vesicleLiquid biopsyMetastasis

Identifiers

PMID35760999
OpenAlexW4286840629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.